Diameter analysis of accessory cones calibrated by calibrating rulers

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the diameter of the FM EL accessory cones calibrated by two calibrating rulers with their respective nominal diameters 80 FM EL gutta percha cones (Odous of God) were calibrated using two calibrating culers of the following brands: Prisma and Denco. The cones were divided in 8 groups (n=10) according to the ruler and the diameter in which they were calibrated. Posteriorly, the cones were photographed and nad their D0 neasured through the software ImageJ. After performing the statistical analysis using the Shapiro- Wilk Normality tests and the Student T test (Normal Distribution), the following results were obtained: there was no stastistically significant difference with the reference value in the prism rule in the cones 40, that is, in all other situations, a difference was found with the reference values. When the median values and standard deviation of the two calibrating rulers were compared, there was also a statistically significant difference (p<0,05) in cones 25, 35 and 40. The FM EL (Odous of God) accessory cones calibrated eita the Denco ruler differed from the nominal diameters of the ruler. Thus, one must pay attention to the accuracy and precision of these instruments in order to avoid possible errors of measurement and interpretation capable of compromising the success of filling in endodontic treatment.

Keywords: Endodontics; Root canal treatment; Root canal filling; gutta percha.