Information processing and eye tracking in survey pretesting

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v18i4.63562

Resumo

Esta pesquisa tem por objetivo investigar a eficácia do rastreamento ocular associado à entrevista cognitiva na identificação de problemas em pré-teste de pesquisa. Realizou-se um quase-experimento, com o uso do rastreamento ocular e a entrevista cognitiva para coletar os dados. Os sujeitos responderam a um questionário online e após conduziu-se uma entrevista cognitiva com perguntas pré-programadas e de sondagem. No tratamento experimental, os movimentos oculares foram rastreados. O questionário utilizado foi o General Decision-Making Style Inventory (GDMS) de Scott e Bruce. Foi possível verificar que o uso do rastreamento ocular associado à entrevista cognitiva é um complemento eficaz na identificação de problemas em pré-teste de pesquisa.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Julia Tontini, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Doutoranda em Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Eliete dos Reis Lehnhart, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Professora do Departamento de Ciências Administrativas da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)

Referências

Aizpurua, E. (2020). Pretesting methods in cross-cultural research. The essential role of language in survey research, 129.

Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2012). Métodos estatísticos para as ciências sociais. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Anthonissen, L. (2020). Cognition in construction grammar: Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive linguistics, 31(2), 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2019-0023

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.

Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public opinion quarterly, 71(2), 287-311. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm006

Bender, C. S. (2019). O processamento da informação online e a decisão de compra em social commerce. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria.

Campoamor, N. B., Guerrini, C. J., Brooks, W. B., Bridges, J. F., & Crossnohere, N. L. (2024). Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z

Casey, G., & Moran, A. (1989). The computational metaphor and cognitive psychology. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03033910.1989.10557739

Conrad, F. G., & Blair, J. (2004). Data quality in cognitive interviews: the case of verbal reports. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires, 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch4

Cozby, P. C. (2003). Métodos de pesquisa em ciências do comportamento. São Paulo: Atlas.

DeMaio, T. J., & Landreth, A. (2004). Do different cognitive interview techniques produce different results?. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch5

Duchowski, T. A. (2017). Eye tracking: methodology theory and practice. Springer International Publishing AG.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2017). Manual de Psicologia Cognitiva-7. Artmed Editora.

Forsyth, B. H., & Lessler, J. T. (2004). Cognitive laboratory methods: A taxonomy. Measurement errors in surveys, 393-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118150382.ch20

Galesic, M. (2018). Use of eye tracking for studying survey response processes 1. In Social and behavioral research and the internet, 349-370, Routledge.

Groves, R. M., Fowler Jr, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology, John Wiley & Sons.

Hair, J., Babin, B., Money, A., & Samouel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Bookman Companhia Ed.

Hilton, C. E. (2017). The importance of pretesting questionnaires: a field research example of cognitive pretesting the Exercise referral Quality of Life Scale (ER-QLS). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1091640

Ikart, E. M. (2018). Questionnaire Pretesting Methods: A Comparison of Cognitive Interviewing and Respondent Debriefing Vis-à-vis the Study of the Adoption of Decision Support Systems by Knowledge Workers. International Journal of Business & Information, 13(2). DOI: 10.6702/ijbi.201806_13(2).0001

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review, 87(4), 329. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329

Kassner, M., Patera, W., & Bulling, A. (2014). Pupil: an open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing: Adjunct publication. https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641695

Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied cognitive psychology, 5(3), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305

Lachman, R., Lachman, J. L., & Butterfield, E. C. (2015). Cognitive psychology and information processing: An introduction. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315798844

Lenzner, T., Hadler, P., & Neuert, C. E. (2024). Cognitive Pretesting. GESIS, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (GESIS – Survey Guidelines), version 3.0, Mannheim, Germany. DOI: 10.15465/gesis-sg_en_049

Lenzner, T., Hadler, P., & Neuert, C. (2023). An experimental test of the effectiveness of cognitive interviewing in pretesting questionnaires. Quality & Quantity, 57(4), 3199-3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01489-4

Lenzner, T., Kaczmirek, L., & Galesic, M. (2014). Left feels right: A usability study on the position of answer boxes in web surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 32(6), 743-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313517532

Liu, M. S., & Wang, M. L. (2020). A multi‐level model of commitment‐based human resource practices on team performance: the team cognition model. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(3), 378-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12220

Löbler, M. L., dos Reis, E., Nishi, J. M., & Tagliapietra, R. D. (2019). Inventário de estilos de tomada de decisão: Validação de instrumento no contexto brasileiro. Revista de Administração Unimep, 17(1).

Luan, J., Yao, Z., Zhao, F., & Liu, H. (2016). Search product and experience product online reviews: An eye-tracking study on consumers' review search behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.037

Maldonado, C. E. (2017). Positive affirmation of non-algorithmic information processing. Cinta de moebio, (60), 279-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2017000300279

Miller, K., Chepp, V., Willson, S., & Padilla, J. L. (Eds.). (2014). Cognitive interviewing methodology. John Wiley & Sons.

Neuert, C. (2016). Eye tracking in questionnaire pretesting. Thesis, Universität Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg.

Olivos, F., & Liu, M. (2024). ChatGPTest: opportunities and cautionary tales of utilizing AI for questionnaire pretesting. Field Methods. https://doi-org.ez47.periodicos.capes.gov.br/10.1177/1525822X241280574

Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Methods for testing and evaluating survey questionnaires, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch1

Presser, S., & Blair, J. (1994). Survey pretesting: Do different methods produce different results?. Sociological methodology, 73-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/270979

Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2013). Metodologia de pesquisa. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and psychological measurement, 55(5), 818-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017

Story, D. A., & Tait, A. R. (2019). Survey research. Anesthesiology, 130(2), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002436

Tagliapietra, R. D. (2018). Investigando a influência das recomendações de produtos online no processo de decisão de compra sob a perspectiva Neuro-IS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria.

Thelk, A. D., & Hoole, E. R. (2006). What are you thinking? Postsecondary student think-alouds of scientific and quantitative reasoning items. The Journal of General Education, 55(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/27798035

Tontini, J., Malheiros, M. B., dos Reis Lehnhart, E., & Rossato, V. P. (2023). Pré-teste cognitivo: um panorama da produção científica internacional. Gestión Joven, 24(3), 12-31.

Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines, 15, 73-100.

Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Sage publications.

Willis, G. (2018). Cognitive interviewing in survey design: State of the science and future directions. The Palgrave handbook of survey research, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6_14

Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum Press.

Yin, R. K. (2016). Pesquisa qualitativa do início ao fim. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-12-17

Edição

Seção

Artigos/Papers