How conceptual frameworks are built

A methodological procedure

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.202.71351

Resumo

This article systematizes the construction of conceptual frameworks and proposes an explicit methodological procedure for their development. A systematic literature review is conducted using a qualitative interpretive approach, followed by thematic coding, integrative synthesis, and analytical reconstruction of recurrent stages. Core operations, disciplinary variations, and deductive, inductive, and abductive logics were identified, resulting in an eight-stage methodological framework organized into three analytical layers. The proposal makes analytical decisions, minimum criteria, and validation mechanisms explicit, enhancing transparency, comparability, rigor, and reproducibility in the development of conceptual frameworks across different research contexts.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Rodrigo Duarte Soliani, Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC)

    Pós-doutor em engenharia de produção e sistemas, doutor em tecnologia ambiental, mestre em administração e bacharel em engenharia de produção. Professor efetivo no Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC), onde coordena o Curso Superior de Tecnologia em Logística e atua como docente permanente no Mestrado Profissional em Propriedade Intelectual e Transferência de Tecnologia para a Inovação (PROFNIT). Desenvolve pesquisas na interface entre logística, inovação e desenvolvimento regional.

  • Everaldo Araújo Ferreira, Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC)

    Doutor e mestre em ciências, especialista em gestão estratégica e mercadológica e bacharel em administração. Professor efetivo no Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC). Desenvolve pesquisas nas áreas de gestão, administração pública, empreendedorismo, gestão do agronegócio, gestão em saúde e modelagem aplicada a projetos.

  • Danielly de Sousa Nóbrega, Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC)

    Doutora em educação, mestre em ensino de ciências e matemática e graduada em ciências da natureza. Professora efetiva no Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC), onde atua no ensino, orientação e coordenação de cursos de graduação e pós-graduação. É docente permanente no Mestrado Profissional em Propriedade Intelectual e Transferência de Tecnologia para a Inovação (PROFNIT). Desenvolve pesquisas nas áreas de ensino de ciências, formação docente e ciência, tecnologia e sociedade.

  • Mario Sérgio Pedroza Lobão, Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC)

    Pós-doutor em desenvolvimento rural, doutor em desenvolvimento regional e agronegócio, mestre em desenvolvimento regional, especialista em gestão administrativa da educação e bacharel em ciências econômicas. Professor efetivo no Instituto Federal do Acre (IFAC), onde atua como docente permanente no Mestrado Profissional em Propriedade Intelectual e Transferência de Tecnologia para a Inovação (PROFNIT). Desenvolve pesquisas nas áreas de desenvolvimento regional, bioeconomia, políticas públicas e economia aplicada.

Referências

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2(100051), 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Bak, P., Keim, D., Kisilevich, S., & Wrobel, S. (2011). A conceptual framework and taxonomy of techniques for analyzing movement. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 22(3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.02.003

Belzen, A. U., Engelschalt, P., & Krüger, D. (2021). Modeling as scientific reasoning—the role of abductive reasoning for modeling competence. Education Sciences, 11(9), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090495

Brady, S. S., Brubaker, L., Fok, C. S., Gahagan, S., Lewis, C. E., Lewis, J., Lowder, J. L., Nodora, J., Stapleton, A., Palmer, M. H., & Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium. (2020). Development of conceptual models to guide public health research, practice, and policy: Synthesizing traditional and contemporary paradigms. Health Promotion Practice, 21(4), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839919890869

Cowhitt, T., Greany, T., & Downey, C. (2023). Storytelling with networks: Realizing the explanatory potential of network diagrams through the integration of qualitative data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231189369

Eyzaguirre, I. A. L., & Fernandes, M. E. B. (2024). Combining methods to conduct a systematic review and propose a conceptual and theoretical framework in socio-environmental research. MethodsX, 12(102484), 102484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102484

Grames, E. M., Schwartz, D., & Elphick, C. S. (2022). A systematic method for hypothesis synthesis and conceptual model development. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 13(9), 2078–2087. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13940

Guzmán, C. A. F., Aguirre, A. A., Astle, B., Barros, E., Bayles, B., Chimbari, M., El-Abbadi, N., Evert, J., Hackett, F., Howard, C., Jennings, J., Krzyzek, A., LeClair, J., Maric, F., Martin, O., Osano, O., Patz, J., Potter, T., Redvers, N., … Zylstra, M. (2021). A framework to guide planetary health education. The Lancet. Planetary Health, 5(5), e253–e255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00110-8

Harwell, M. A., Gentile, J. H., McKinney, L. D., Tunnell, J. W., Jr, Dennison, W. C., Kelsey, R. H., Stanzel, K. M., Stunz, G. W., Withers, K., & Tunnell, J. (2019). Conceptual framework for assessing ecosystem health. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 15(4), 544–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4152

Heger, T., Aguilar-Trigueros, C. A., Bartram, I., Braga, R. R., Dietl, G. P., Enders, M., Gibson, D. J., Gómez-Aparicio, L., Gras, P., Jax, K., Lokatis, S., Lortie, C. J., Mupepele, A.-C., Schindler, S., Starrfelt, J., Synodinos, A. D., & Jeschke, J. M. (2021). The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach: A synthesis method for enhancing theory development in ecology and evolution. Bioscience, 71(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaa130

Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800406

Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0

Johanning, S., Bruggemans, P., Edelenbosch, O., & Bruckner, T. (2024). Integrative review-based conceptual modeling: An agent-based modeling Synthesis of dynamic energy tariff research and models. Energies, 17(22), 5715. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225715

Jull, J. E., Davidson, L., Dungan, R., Nguyen, T., Woodward, K. P., & Graham, I. D. (2019). A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0838-1

Koivunen, K., Schaap, L. A., Hoogendijk, E. O., Schoonmade, L. J., Huisman, M., & van Schoor, N. M. (2022). Exploring the conceptual framework and measurement model of intrinsic capacity defined by the World Health Organization: A scoping review. Ageing Research Reviews, 80(101685), 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101685

Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290601081407

Lindgreen, A., Di Benedetto, C. A., Brodie, R. J., & Jaakkola, E. (2021). How to develop great conceptual frameworks for business-to-business marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, A2–A10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.005

Lukyanenko, R., Samuel, B. M., Parsons, J., Storey, V. C., Pastor, O., & Jabbari, A. (2024). Universal conceptual modeling: principles, benefits, and an agenda for conceptual modeling research. Software and Systems Modeling, 23, 1077–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-024-01207-8

Luft, J. A., Jeong, S., Idsardi, R., & Gardner, G. (2022). Literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks: An introduction for new biology education researchers. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(3), rm33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-05-0134

MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136

McKenna, H. P. (2025). A review of data models and frameworks in urban environments in the context of AI. Urban Science, 9(7), 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9070239

McMeekin, N., Wu, O., Germeni, E., & Briggs, A. (2020). How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4

Morioka, S. N., & Carvalho, M. M. (2016). A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Nagel, B., & Partelow, S. (2022). A methodological guide for applying the social-ecological system (SES) framework: a review of quantitative approaches. Ecology and Society: A Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-13493-270439

Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science: IS, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B., & Hulland, J. (2018). Review articles: purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4

Partelow, S. (2023). What is a framework? Understanding their purpose, value, development and use. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 13(3), 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00833-w

Paul, J., Khatri, P., & Kaur Duggal, H. (2024). Frameworks for developing impactful systematic literature reviews and theory building: What, Why and How? Journal of Decision Systems, 33(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2197700

Rasolofoarison, D., & Russell, C. A. (2024). Get the picture? Using visuals to represent theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52(2), 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00980-0

Sale, J. E. M., & Carlin, L. (2025). The reliance on conceptual frameworks in qualitative research - a way forward. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 25(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02461-0

Saunders, C. H., Sierpe, A., von Plessen, C., Kennedy, A. M., Leviton, L. C., Bernstein, S. L., Goldwag, J., King, J. R., Marx, C. M., Pogue, J. A., Saunders, R. K., Van Citters, A., Yen, R. W., Elwyn, G., & Leyenaar, J. K. (2023). Practical thematic analysis: a guide for multidisciplinary health services research teams engaging in qualitative analysis. BMJ, 381, e074256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-074256

Schreiber, F., & Cramer, C. (2022). Towards a conceptual systematic review: proposing a methodological framework. Educational Review, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2116561

Silva, J. C. K., Soliani, R. D., Ferreira-Júnior, G. C., Lovrić, N., & Lobão, M. S. P. (2025). Can a digital platform framework advance the bioeconomy and the sustainability in the Amazon?: literature review. Gestão & Produção, 32. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2025v32e14724

Soliani, R. D., Oliveira, D. A. de, Pontes, J. da C. N., & Drumond, T. D. R. (2025). Professional training in Industry 4.0: a competency-based educational model. Gestão & Produção, 32(e2225). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2025v32e2225

Tark, A., Estrada, L. V., Stone, P. W., Baernholdt, M., & Buck, H. G. (2023). Systematic review of conceptual and theoretical frameworks used in palliative care and end-of-life care research studies. Palliative Medicine, 37(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163221122268

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

Ullah, F. (2021). A beginner’s guide to developing review-based conceptual frameworks in the built environment. Architecture, 1(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture1010003

Van Biljon, J., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2020). The communicative power of knowledge visualizations in mobilizing information and communication technology research. Information Technology for Development, 26(4), 637–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1821954

Waldt, G. (2020). Constructing conceptual frameworks in social science research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v16i1.758

Zhang, J., Salomon, H., Huber, M. N., Bugmann, H., Dölker, J. E., König, L., Krähenbühl, J., Lieberherr, E., Logar, I., McArdell, B., Molnar, P., Quatrini, S., Schick, V., Schlunegger, F., Schmidt, C., Zabel, A., & Hoffmann, S. (2025). Developing a conceptual framework for interdisciplinary communication, collaboration, and integration: A structured approach. Ambio, 54(12), 2118–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02210-z

Downloads

Publicado

2026-10-21

Edição

v. 20 n. 2 (2026)

Seção

Artigos/Papers

Licença

Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License, permitindo o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista. 

A Revista usa o CC BY. Essa licença permite que outras pessoas distribuam, remixem, adaptem e desenvolvam seu trabalho, mesmo comercialmente, desde que sejam creditadas pela criação original. Essa é a licença mais flexível oferecida. Recomendado para máxima disseminação e uso de materiais licenciados.

Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), sempre com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

A Revista ulitiliza o DOI (Digital Object Identifier ) desde 2007 O DOI com a finalidade de autenticar cada artigo, portanto seu conteúdo digital.