The Classification of Environmental Racism: A Case Study on Disinformation, Digital Performance, and Ideological Disputes in Brazilian Political Discourse
A Case Study with Insights on Disinformation Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/cad3f803Palavras-chave:
Classification, Environmental Racism, Narratives, Disinformation, DiscourseResumo
This paper examines how environmental racism is classifi ed and contested in Brazilian political discourse through disinformation narratives, focusing on Minister Anielle Franco and Deputy Kim Kataguiri’s pronouncements during the January 2024 fl oods in Rio de Janeiro. Analyzing their Twitter and Instagram performances through Bowker and Star’s (1999) classifi cation theory, Bastos and Tuters’ (2023) concept of disinformation as aff ective ritual, and Black and Indigenous thought, I show how rhetorical, visual, and aff ective strategies work to legitimize or delegitimize the term. Disinformation here is understood not as mere factual distortion, but as undermining the moral and epistemic foundations of structural concepts, shaping whether environmental injustice is made visible or discredited.
Downloads
Referências
Bastos dos Santos, J. G., & Chagas, V. (2018). Fucking right-wing: MBL’s personal frames and ultraliberal agenda. Matrizes, 12(3).
Bastos, M., & Tuters, M. (2023). Meaningful disinformation: Narrative rituals and affective folktales. Big Data & Society, 10(2).
Bento, C. (2022). O pacto da branquitude. Companhia das Letras
Bouqvar, N. (2022). Environmental racism and 2030 Agenda: An analysis of the municipality of Rio de
Janeiro (Master’s thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro).
Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2010). Toward information infrastructure studies:
Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, & M. Allen (Eds.), International
handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Springer.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
Bullard, R. D. (1993). Confronting environmental racism: Voices from the grassroots. South End Press.
Carneiro, S. (2023). Dispositivo de racialidade: A construção do outro como não ser como fundamento do
ser. Companhia das Letras.
Davis, A. (1983). Women, race & class. Vintage.
Deloria Jr, V. (2003). God is red: A native view of religion (3rd ed.). Fulcrum Publishing.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges.
Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Graves, L. (2017). Anatomy of a fact check: Objective practice and the contested epistemology of fact
checking. Communication, Culture & Critique, 10(3), 518–537.
Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of
Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University, 1–15.
Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707–1791.
Hartinger, S. M., et al. (2023). The 2022 South America report of the Lancet Countdown on health and
climate change: Trust the science. Now that we know, we must act. The Lancet Regional Health – Americas.
Hase, V., Boczek, K., & Scharkow, M. (2023). Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform,
multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Digital
Journalism, 11(8), 1499–1520.
Herculano, S. (2002). Riscos e desigualdade social: A temática da Justiça Ambiental e sua construção no
Brasil. Encontro da ANPPAS, 1–15.
Hong, S., & Hermann, S. N. (2020). Fuck your feelings: The affective weaponization of facts and reason.
In M. Paasonen, A. Kuntsman, & A. Karatzogianni (Eds.), Affective politics of digital media (pp. 86–100).
Routledge.
Kreiss, D., & McGregor, S. C. (2023). A review and provocation: On polarization and platforms. New Media
& Society, 26(1), 556–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231161880
Lipsitz, G. (2006). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics
(Rev. ed.). Temple University Press.
Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling
and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
Recuero, R. (2024). A rede da desinformação: Sistemas, estruturas e dinâmicas nas plataformas de mídias
sociais. Editora Sulina.
Rio de Janeiro. (2024, January 31). Decreto n. 53.912. Dispõe sobre as competências da Secretaria
Municipal de Meio Ambiente e Clima - SMAC. http://leismunicipa.is/13rhz
Roberts, J. D., Dickinson, K. L., Hendriks, M. D., & Jennings, V. (2022). “I can’t breathe”: Examining the legacy of American racism on determinants of health and the ongoing pursuit of environmental justice.
Current Environmental Health Reports, 9, 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-022-00343-x
Rossette-Crake, F. (2025). When politicians follow in the steps of influencers: Social media oratory on
Instagram and the issue of political legitimacy. Discourse, Context & Media, 53, 100802.
Soares, F., & Volcan, T. (2024). Memes políticos, humor e eleições: O uso de memes como estratégia
de propagação no Twitter. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984
6398202417859
Solberg Søilen, K., & Huber, S. (2006). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured,
focused comparison. Lund Institute of Economic Research Working Paper Series, (1).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The problem of the environment. In J. G. Berman (Ed.), The collected works of L. S.
Vygotsky: The fundamentals of defectology (Vol. 2, pp. 341–348). Springer.
Watts, N., et al. (2019). The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: Ensuring
that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate. The Lancet, 394(10211), 1836
1878. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32596-6
Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9(June), 1–6.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Bárbara Tauffner

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicar o seu trabalho pela primeira vez sob a licença Creative Commons (CC-BY), que permite o intercâmbio de obras e reconhecimento de autoria na revista.