Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?

Authors

  • Sírio Possenti Unicamp

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33071

Keywords:

controversy, discourse, text, reference

Abstract

This work believes that there is hardly any debates or controversy in the Brazilian academy, at least in the area of language studies. After reflecting about the theory of Dascal, which discusses the relevance of the controversies, the distinction between studies of text and studies of discourse is analyzed, since the term “discourse” is often related to both of them. It is presented the fundamental differences on certain issues (subject, reading, multisemiosis) and it is emphasized the different conceptions about a current subject in Brazil: the reference. The thesis is that the solutions from discourse analysis and from the study of text are incompatible and that issues like this should be explicitly discussed, as if to “discover” the best solution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sírio Possenti, Unicamp

Professor associado no Departamento de Linguística do Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem da Unicamp, onde fez mestrado e doutorado. Leciona disciplinas introdutórias à linguística e à análise do discurso, campo no qual realiza pesquisas e orienta estudantes de Iniciação Científica, Mestrado e Doutorado. Estuda os discursos humorístico, jornalístico e publicitário. Publicou Discurso, estilo e subjetividade (S. Paulo: Martins Fontes), Os humores da língua (Campinas: Mercado de Letras) e Os limites do discurso e Questões para analistas do discurso (São Paulo: Parábola) e Humor, Língua e Discurso (São Paulo: Contexto). Co-organizou coletâneas de trabalhos em análise do discurso e traduziu Gênese dos discursos, de Dominique Maingueneau.

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

Possenti, S. (2010). Theories of text and discourse: incompatible?. Gragoatá, 15(29). https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v15i29.33071