Implicit argumentation as a patemization strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v24i50.34169Keywords:
argumentation, patemization, implicit content.Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate how, through implicit meanings, the arguing subject can lead the interpreting subject to experience certain emotions. For this, we analyze a journalistic chronicle written by Luiz Garcia in light of the theoretical and methodological postulates of the Semiolinguistic Theory of Discourse, proposed by Patrick Charaudeau, as well as of Ducrot and Anscombre's Theory of Argumentation in Language. We realized that various presupposed and implicit contents, that is, implicit meanings, presented by the enunciator subject of the chronicle, are capable of producing certain pathemic effects on the interpreting subject, depending on their values and beliefs. In the textual argumentative project, the patemization contributes to the capture of the reader, possibly leading him to accept the thesis defended by the enunciator.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Gragoatá agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the rights and give the journal the right to the first publication, simultaneously subject to a Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC 4.0, which allows sharing by third parties with due mention to the author and the first publication by Gragoatá.
Authors may enter into additional and separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (for example, posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in Gragoatá.
Gragoatá is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.