POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE REPERCUSSIONS IN PUBLIC INNOVATION POLICIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v.201.70414Abstract
This study aims to explore the possible conditions that most contribute to the success or failure of public innovation policies inspired by the principles of Intelligent Specialization (IS). A qualitative research approach was used, employing questionnaires and interviews for data collection, and fsQCA and thematic content analysis for data analysis. The main analyses highlighted the conditions that most contributed to promising IS results, while the interviews allowed for a deeper understanding of possible reasons for certain unsatisfactory IS results, as indicated by fsQCA.
Downloads
References
Asheim, B. T. (2019). Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001.
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. 70. ed. São Paulo, SP: Vozes.
Coenen, L., & Morgan, K. (2020). Evolving geographies of innovation: existing paradigms, critiques and possible alternatives. Norwegian Journal of Geography, (74)1, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1692065.
Crespo, N. F., Rodrigues, R., Samagaio, A., & Silva, G. M. (2019). The adoption of management control systems by start-ups: internal factors and contexto as determinents. Journal Business Research, (101), 875-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.020.
Di-Cataldo, M., Monastiriotis, V., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2021). How ‘smart’ are smart specialization strategies? Journal of Common Market Studies.
Edital nº 01/2022. (2022). Programas Clusters Econômicos de Inovação e Corredores Digitais. Fortaleza: Governo do Estado do Ceará. 32 p.
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation Policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic, (33)1, 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, (14) 4, 532-550.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, (19)1, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/147612702098286.
Fiss, P. C. (2009). Pratical Issues in QCA. Academy of Management.
Foray, D. et al. (2015). Smart Specialisation: opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy. Abingdon: Routledge, Regional Studies Association.
Godoi, C. K., Bandeira-de-Melo, R., & Silva, A. B. (2006). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais. Paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo, SP: Saraiva.
Hassink, R, & Gong, H. (2019). Six critical questions about smart specialisation. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1650898.
Kim, K., Ferrante, C., & Kogler, D. (2024). Smart specialisation strategies and regional knowledge Spaces: how to bridge vision and reality. Regional Studies, (58)12, 2501-2517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2355985.
Kruse, M. (2024). Inter-organizational Sustainability cooperation among european regions and the role of smart specialisation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, (15), 16735-16779.
Laranja, M., Perianez-Forte, I., & Reimeris, R. (2022). Discovery processes for transformative innovation policy. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Marrocu, E., Paci, R., Rigby, D., & Usai, S. (2022). Evaluating the implementation of smart specialisation policy. Regional Studies, 57(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2047915.
Mazzucato, M. (2017). Mission-Orientied Innovation Policy: challenges and opportunities. Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper. London: University College.
Meyer, C. (2022). Social innovation Governance in smart specialisation policies and strategies heading towards Sustainability: a pathway to RIS4? Social Sciences, (150)11. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11040150.
Morgan, K. (2017). Nurturing novelty: regional innovation policy in the age of smart specialisation. Environment and Planning C, (35)4, 569-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16645106.
Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robert, V., & Yoguel, G. (2022) Exploration of trending concepts in innovation policy. Review of Evolutionary Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-022-00064-9.
Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2019). Shaping smart specialization: the role of place-specific fators in advanced, intermediate ans less-developed european regions. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1328-1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763.
Vasconcellos, S. M. L., Frare, A., Cruz, A. P. C., & Barbosa, M. A. G. (2022). Sistema de mensuração de desempenho, estratégias genéricas e suporte do ecossistema de negócios: efeitos no desempenho de startups. Revista Universo Contábil, 18, 01-21. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2022101.
Wibisono, E. (2022). Smart specialization in less developed regions of European Union: a systematic literature review. Region, 9(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.388.
Woodside, A. G. (2012). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with simultaneously license under the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting sharing the paper with acknowledgment of its first publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to take additional contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (eg, publish in institutional repository or publish as a chapter of a book), always with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
