PROJETOS EMPRESARIAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO: O IPES e os CONEPEs na Ditadura Empresarial-militar brasileira

Authors

  • Renata Azevedo Campos Universidade Federal Fluminense

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/mov.v0i5.32616

Abstract

Este artigo objetiva analisar as disputas, entre as frações empresariais, em torno dos rumos da reforma educacional da ditadura empresarial-militar brasileira. A principal questão colocada são os conflitos entre os empresários de ensino e o empresariado industrial, cujos interesses educacionais são, senão conflitantes, ao menos heterogêneos. Nessa perspectiva, o projeto educacional do Instituto de Pesquisa e Estudos Sociais será confrontado com as proposições dos empresários de ensino, participantes dos Congressos Nacionais dos Estabelecimentos Particulares de Ensino.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-04

How to Cite

Campos, R. A. (2017). PROJETOS EMPRESARIAIS PARA A EDUCAÇÃO: O IPES e os CONEPEs na Ditadura Empresarial-militar brasileira. Movement - Education Journal, (5). https://doi.org/10.22409/mov.v0i5.32616

Issue

No. 5 (2016): Educação pública: projetos em disputa

Section

Thematic Dossier

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution-Non-Commercial International4.0, which allows the sharing of work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) after publication in this journal.

The sources indicated, the ideas and opinions expressed are the sole responsibility of the authors, not necessarily reflecting the opinions of the journal.