The internet as a moral space: an analysis of the “teachings” of Deboísmo

Authors

  • Henrique Mazetti Universidade Federal de Viçosa
  • Ricardo Duarte Gomes da Silva Universidade Federal de Viçosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v36i3.1039

Keywords:

Deboísmo, Moralidade, Internet.

Abstract

This paper studies Deboísmo, a "movement" popularized on social networks, which preaches the "doctrine" of "take it easy" and disseminates these teachings using internet’s typical language, such as memes and humorous images. Based on the premise that the media plays an important role in articulating ethical dilemmas, the aim of this paper is to understand what are some of the characteristics of the moral precepts being developed and circulating on the internet. In theoretical terms, the article addresses the relationship between media and morality and the characteristics of the contemporary morality. In empirical terms, the research involves the analysis of the aesthetic quality and the moral agency (Chouliaraki, 2008) of the commandments of the deboísmo published on a page named Deboísmo on Facebook (www.fb.com/deboismo).
Keywords: Deboísmo; Morality; Internet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Henrique Mazetti, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Professor do Departamento de Comunicação Social da UFV. Doutor em Comunicação pela ECO/UFRJ.

Ricardo Duarte Gomes da Silva, Universidade Federal de Viçosa

Professor do Departamento de Comunicação Social da UFV. Doutor em Comunicação pela UFMG.

References

AHMED, Sara. Cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014.

BOYD, danah. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: BUCKINGHAM, D. (org.) Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, p. 119–142. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008.

CHOULIARAKI, Lilie. The media as moral education: mediation and action. Media, Culture & Society, v. 30, n. 6, p. 831-852, 2008.

______. The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

DEUZE, Mark. Media life. Nova Iorque, Polity, 2012.

LIPOVETSKY, Gilles. A Felicidade Paradoxal. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007.

______. O crepúsculo do dever. Lisboa: Dom Quixote, 1994.

MACINTYRE, Alastair. After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.

RECUERO, Raquel. Redes sociais na internet. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2009.

______. A conversação em rede. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2012.

SILVERSTONE, Roger. Por que estudar a mídia? São Paulo: Loyola, 2002.

______. Media and morality. Londres: Polity Press, 2007.

TAYLOR, Charles. As fontes do self: a construção da identidade moderna. São Paulo: Loyola, 2005.

______. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007

TURKLE, Sherry. Alone Together. New York: Basic Books, 2011.

VAZ, Paulo. O destino do fait divers: política, risco e ressentimento no Brasil contemporâneo. Revista FAMECOS, v. 1, n. 35, 2008.

ZIZEK, Slavoj. O hedonismo envergonhado, caderno Mais!, Folha de São Paulo, 19 de outubro de 2003.

Published

2017-12-18