Polarização, Hiperpartidarismo e Câmaras de Eco: Como circula a Desinformação sobre Covid-19 no Twitter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v40i1.45611Palavras-chave:
Desinformação, Twitter, Hidroxicloroquina, Links, Câmara de eco.Resumo
Neste artigo, analisamos a circulação de links desinformativos sobre a pandemia de Covid-19 no Twitter, a partir de um conjunto de 159.560 links coletados da API do Twitter entre os meses de março e julho de 2020. Através de um mapeamento da rede e da observação da vizinhança dos links e dos links mais compartilhados, observamos uma polarização e redução da circulação dos links de acordo com seu sentido (pró-hidroxicloroquina ou anti-hidroxicloroquina). Os resultados também apontam para uma maior atividade na divulgação de links pró-hidroxicloroquina, grupo onde também circula a maior quantidade de desinformação e de veículos hiperpartidários. Do mesmo modo, a circulação de veículos de mídia tradicional e institucionais é bastante reduzida neste grupo, fortalecendo a associação entre mídia hiperpartidária e desinformação.
Downloads
Referências
ADAMIC, Lada A.; GLANCE, Natalie. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, Chicago, p. 36-43, 2005. DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1134271.1134277.
ALLCOTT, Hunt; BOXELL, Levi; CONWAY, Jacob C.; GENTZKOW, Matthew; THALER, Michael; YANG, David Y. Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic (Working Paper No. 26946; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26946.
ALVES, Marcelo. Desarranjo da visibilidade, desordem informacional e polarização no Brasil entre 2013 e 2018. Tese de doutorado defendida no Programa de Pós Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Federal Fluminense. 2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20523.80169
ALVES, Marcelo; ALBUQUERQUE, Afonso. Perda da hegemonia da imprensa: a disputa pela visibilidade na eleição de 2018. Lumina, v. 13, n. 3, p. 5-27, 2019.
ANDRIS, Clio; LEE, David; HAMILTON, Marcus J.; MARTINO, Mauro; GUNNING, Christian E.; SELDEN, John Armistead. The Rise of Partisanship and Super-Cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives. PLoS ONE, v. 10, n. 4, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123507.
AQUINO BITTENCOURT, Maria Clara. Ciberacontecimento e jornalismo digital: o impacto do compartilhamento e da produção de sentidos nas práticas jornalísticas. Estudos em Jornalismo e Mídia, v 12, n. 2, p. 342-358, jul./dez. 2015.
ARAÚJO, Ronald; OLIVEIRA, Thaiane. A Desinformação e mensagens sobre a hidroxicloroquina no Twitter. SciELO Pré-prints. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1113.
BAIL, Christopher A.; ARGYLE, Lisa P.; BROWN, Taylor W.; BUMPUS, John P.; CHEN, Haohan; HUNZAKER, M. B. Fallin; LEE, Jaemin; MANN, Marcus; MERHOUT, Friedolin; VOLFOVSKY, Alexander. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. PNAS, v. 115, n. 37, p. 9216–9221, 2018.
BAKSHY, Eytan; MESSING, Solomon; ADAMIC, Lada A. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook, Science, v. 348, n. 6239, p. 1130-1132, 2015. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1160.
BARBERÁ, Pablo. How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. Proceedings of the 2015 APSA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2015. Disponível em: https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/apsa/apsa15/index.php?cmd=Online+Program+View+Paper&selected_paper_id=997865&PHPSESSID=ai1fh85m28gqmu9vd308q3ef6r.
BARBERÁ, Pablo. Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization. In: PERSILY, Nathaniel; TUCKER, Joshua (org.). In: Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 34-55.
BARBERÁ, Pablo; JOST, John T; NAGLER, Jonathan; TUCKER, Joshua A.; BONNEAU, Richard. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?, Psychological Science, v. 26, n. 10, 1531–1542, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594620.
BENKLER, Yochai; FARIS, Robert; ROBERTS, Hal. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, disiformation, and radicalization in american politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
BORN, Kelly; EDGINGTON. Analysis of philanthropic opportunities to mitigate the disinformation/propaganda problem. Menlo Park, CA: Hewlett Foundation, 2017.
BRENNEN, Scott; SIMON, Felix; HOWARD, Philip N.; NIELSEN, Rasmus Kleis. Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Oxford: Reuters Institute Factsheet, 2020. Disponível em https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation.
BLONDEL, Vincent D.; GUILLAUME, Jean-Loup; LAMBIOTTE, Renaud; LEFEBVRE, Etienne. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10), P1000.
BRUNS, A. Are Filter Bubbles Real?. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2019.
BRUNS, Axel; HARRINGTON, Stephen; HURCOMBE, Edward. ‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook. Media International Australia, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20946113.
BRUNS, Axel; MOE, Hallvard. Structural Layers of Communication on Twitter. In: WELLER, Katrin; BRUNS, Axel; BURGESS, Jean; MAHRT, Merja; PUSCHMANN, Cornelius (ed.). Twitter and Society. Nova York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014. p. 15-28.
DEGENNE, Alain; FORSE Michel. Introducing Social Networks. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1999.
DUBOIS, Elizabeth; BLANK, Grant. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, v. 21, n. 5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
EADY, Gregory; NAGLER, Jonathan; GUESS, Andy; ZILINSKY, Jan; TUCKER, Joshua A. How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data. SAGE Open, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705.
FALLIS, Don. What Is Disinformation?. Library Trends, v. 63, n. 3, p. 401-426, 2015.
FLAXMAN, Seth; GOEL, Sharad; RAO, Justin M. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Special Issue, p. 298-320, 2016.
GUILLE, A.; HACID, H.; FAVRE, C.; ZIGHED, D. Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks: A Survey. ACM Sigmod Record, v.42, n. 2, p. 17-28, 2013
GRUZD, Anatoliy; MAI, Philip. Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter. Big Data & Society, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1-9, 2020.
GRUZD, Anatoliy; ROY, Jeffrey. Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective. Policy and Internet, v. 6, n. 1, p. 28-45, 2014.
GUESS, Andrew; LYONS, Benjamin; NYHAN, Brendan; REIFLER, Jason. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Miami: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, 2018.
HIMELBOIM, Itai; SMITH, Marc A.; RAINIE, Lee; SCHNEIDERMAN, Ben; ESPINA, Camila. Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, p. 1-13, jan./mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545.
JACK, Caroline. Lexicon of Lies: Terms for Problematic Information. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, 2017.
JENKINS, H.; FORD, S.; GREEN, J. Spreadable Media. New York: NYU Press, 2013.
LARSSON, Anders Olof. News Use as Amplification – Norwegian National, Regional and Hyperpartisan Media on Facebook. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, v. 96, p. 3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019831439.
MAIA, Rousiley C. M. Visibilidade midiática e deliberação pública. In: GOMES, Wilson; MAIA, Rousiley C. M. Comunicação e democracia: Problemas & Perspectivas. São Paulo: Paulus, 2008. p. 117-162.
MAIREDER, Axel; AUSSERHOFER, Julian. Political Discourses on Twitter: Networking Topics, Objects, and People. In: WELLER, Katrin; BRUNS, Axel; BURGESS, Jean; MAHRT, Merja; PUSCHMANN, Cornelius (ed.). Twitter and Society. Nova York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014. p. 305-318.
MARWICK, Alice; LEWIS, Rebecca. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, 2017.
MOURÃO, Rachel R.; ROBERTSON, Craig T. Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information. Journalism Studies, v.20, n. 14, p. 2077-2095, 2019.
PAPAKYRIAKOPOULOS, Orestis; SERRANO, Juan Carlos Median; HEGELICH, Simon. The spread of COVID-19 conspiracy theories on social media and the effect of content moderation. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-034.
RECUERO, Raquel; ARAÚJO, Ricardo; ZAGO, Gabriela. How does Social Capital affect Retweets?. Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, V, Barcelona, Spain: AAAI, 2011.
RECUERO, Raquel; SOARES, Felipe. O Discurso Desinformativo sobre a Cura do COVID-19 no Twitter: Estudo de caso. E-Compós, 2020. Pré-print SciELO: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/84/1022.
RECUERO, Raquel; SOARES, Felipe Bonow; GRUZD, Anatoliy. Hyperpartisanship, Disinformation and Political Conversations on Twitter: The Brazilian Presidential Election of 2018. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14(1), p. 569-578, 2020.
RECUERO, Raquel; ZAGO, Gabriela; SOARES, Felipe Bonow. Mídia social e filtros-bolha nas conversações políticas no Twitter. In: Encontro Anual da Compós, XXVI, 2017. Faculdade Cásper Líbero, São Paulo. Anais... São Paulo: Compós, 2017a. Disponível em http://www.compos.org.br/data/arquivos_2017/trabalhos_arquivo_XH5ITTDY1PYGE7PDUQJM_26_5374_18_02_2017_12_53_33.pdf.
SMITH, Marc; RAINIE, Lee; HIMELBOIM, Itai; SHNEIDERMAN, Ben. Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2014.
SOARES, Felipe Bonow; RECUERO, Raquel; ZAGO, Gabriela. Influencers in Polarized Political Networks on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Media & Society, Copenhagen, Denmark (SMSociety), 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3217804.3217909.
SOARES, Felipe Bonow; VIEGAS, Paula; SUDBRACK, Shana; RECUERO, Raquel; HÜTTNER, Luiz Ricardo. Desinformação e esfera pública no Twitter: disputas discursivas sobre o assassinato de Marielle Franco. Revista Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos, v. 21, n. 3, p. 2-14. DOI: 10.4013/fem.2019.213.01.
SOCIAL FEED MANAGER. George Washington University Libraries. (2016). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.597278
SUNSTEIN, Cass. Echo Chambers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
TUCKER, Joshua Aaron; GUESS, Andrew; BARBERA, Pablo; VACCARI, Cristian; SIEGEL, Alexandra; SANOVICH, Sergey; STUKAL, Denis; NYHAN, Brendan. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Menlo Park, CA: Hewlett Foundation, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139.
USCINSKI, Joseph E.; ENDERS, Adam M.; KLOFSTAD, Casey; SEELIG, Michelle; FUNCHION, John; EVERETT, Caleb; WUCHTY, Stephan; PREMARATNE, Kamal; MURTHI, Manohar.Uscinski, Joseph E.; Enders, Adam M.; Klofstad, Casey A.; Seelig, Michelle I.; Funchion, John, R.; Everett, Caleb; Wuchty, Stephan; Premaratne, Kamal; Murthi, Manohar, N. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015.
WARDLE, Claire. Understanding Information Disorder. Brighton: First Draft, 2019.
WARDLE, Claire; DERAKHSHAN, Hossein. Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2017.
WASSERMAN, Stanley; FAUST, Katherine. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Appliccations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
ZAGO, Gabriela; BASTOS, Marco Toledo. Visibilidade de Notícias no Twitter e no Facebook: Análise Comparativa das Notícias mais Repercutidas na Europa e nas Américas. Brazilian Journalism Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 116-133, 2013.
ZAGO, G. Circulação e recirculação de narrativas do acontecimento no jornalismo em rede: a Copa do Mundo de 2014 no Twitter. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação e Informação), Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2014.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Contracampo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicar o seu trabalho pela primeira vez sob a licença Creative Commons (CC-BY), que permite o intercâmbio de obras e reconhecimento de autoria na revista.
