PRESUPPOSITION AND IMPLICIT ACCORDING TO ARGUMENTATION IN LANGUAGE THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v21i40.33385Keywords:
Presupposition. Implicit. MeaningAbstract
This study aims to conduct a diachronic study of the presupposition and implicit concepts according to Argumentation in Language Theory (ALT). Initially developed by Oswald Ducrot and Jean-Claude Anscombre and, more recently, by Oswald Ducrot and Marion Carel, the ALT went through reformulations which kept it faithful to its basic presupposed, that is, the argumentation is within the language. Those reformulations, such as exclusion of pragmatic elements and the non-acceptance of topoi as constructive of meaning, impacted in the explanation of some linguistic phenomena, among which we situate those that we are analyzing. To carry out our aim, it was read some theoretical texts which deal with the issue in order to retrace the path that presents how the presupposition and implicit are understood in each one of the phases.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in Gragoatá agree to the following terms:
The authors retain the rights and give the journal the right to the first publication, simultaneously subject to a Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC 4.0, which allows sharing by third parties with due mention to the author and the first publication by Gragoatá.
Authors may enter into additional and separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (for example, posting it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with recognition of its initial publication in Gragoatá.
Gragoatá is licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.