Specific Objects and Disquieting Objects: Provocations from a Footnote

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/poiesis.v23i40.53139

Keywords:

Minimal Art, Specific Objects, Disquieting Objects, Donald Judd and Robert Morris, theory and historiography of contemporary art, Donald Judd y Robert Morris

Abstract

Observe the detail. Irrefutable invitation. It is precisely from the fractures opened by the details that this paper aims to investigate. Specifically, the one that the Minimal Art movement, with its well-defined theoretical and plastic assumptions, allows us to glimpse discursive inconsistencies. Considering the theoretical dispute engendered from the quarrel between Donald Judd e Robert Morris in the 1960’s, this paper seeks to question the limits of Minimal argument of specificity opposing it to the notion of disquieting object after observing a footnote within the process of historicization of this artistic movement. Thus, starting from this detail, that passes by the most attentive eyes, that this paper questions discourses of certainty that cross historiography about Minimal Art, aiming to contribute to the broader debate around this movement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Guilherme Santos, Universidade de Brasília, Brasil

Guilherme Moreira Santos é doutorando do PPGAV da Universidade de Brasília.

Vera Pugliese, Universidade de Brasília, Brasil

Vera Pugliese é doutora e docente do PPGAV da Universidade de Brasília.

References

ANDRADE, M. A. P. O experimental nas décadas de 1960-70 como tratado: pressupostos e um estudo de caso. In: KNAUSS, Paulo; MALTA, Marise. (Org.). Objetos do Olhar: História da Arte. São Paulo: Rafael Copetti, 2015, v. 1, p. 236-246.

BOIS, Yve-Alain. A pintura como modelo. São Paulo: WMF Martins Fontes, 2009.

FRIED, Michael. Art and objecthood. In BATTCOCK, Gregory. Minimal Art: a critical anthology. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press Ltd., 1995, p.116-147

FOSTER, Hal. O retorno do real. São Paulo: Cosac Naify, 2014.

FOSTER, Hal. Object Lessons: Hal Foster on the art of Donald Judd. Artforum, Nova York, v. 58, n. 9, maio/jun, 2020, n.p. Disponível em https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/hal-foster-on-the-art-of-donald-judd-82817. Acesso em 27/05/2021.

GREENBERG, Clement. A necessidade do formalismo. In COTRIM, Cecilia; FERREIRA, Glória (Org.). Clement Greenberg e o debate crítico. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1997, p. 125-130.

JUDD, Donald. Objetos específicos. In COTRIM, Cecilia; FERREIRA, Glória (Org.). Escritos de artistas: anos 60/70. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2006, p. 96-106.

KRAUSS, R. A escultura no campo ampliado. Revista Gávea, Rio de Janeiro: PUC-RJ, n. 1, 1984, p. 87-93.

KRAUSS, Rosalind. Allusion and illusion in Donald Judd. Artforum, Nova York, v. 4, n. 9, maio 1966, p. 24-25. Disponível em https://www.artforum.com/print/196605/allusion-and-illusion-in-donald-judd-37789. Acesso em 27/05/2021.

MEYER, James. Minimalism: Art and Polemics in the Sixties. New Haven e Londres: Yale University Press, 2001.

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Santos, G., & Pugliese, V. (2022). Specific Objects and Disquieting Objects: Provocations from a Footnote. REVISTA POIÉSIS, 23(40), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.22409/poiesis.v23i40.53139