Polarização, Hiperpartidarismo e Câmaras de Eco: Como circula a Desinformação sobre Covid-19 no Twitter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v40i1.45611Palabras clave:
Desinformação, Twitter, Hidroxicloroquina, Links, Câmara de eco.Resumen
Neste artigo, analisamos a circulação de links desinformativos sobre a pandemia de Covid-19 no Twitter, a partir de um conjunto de 159.560 links coletados da API do Twitter entre os meses de março e julho de 2020. Através de um mapeamento da rede e da observação da vizinhança dos links e dos links mais compartilhados, observamos uma polarização e redução da circulação dos links de acordo com seu sentido (pró-hidroxicloroquina ou anti-hidroxicloroquina). Os resultados também apontam para uma maior atividade na divulgação de links pró-hidroxicloroquina, grupo onde também circula a maior quantidade de desinformação e de veículos hiperpartidários. Do mesmo modo, a circulação de veículos de mídia tradicional e institucionais é bastante reduzida neste grupo, fortalecendo a associação entre mídia hiperpartidária e desinformação.
Descargas
Citas
ADAMIC, Lada A.; GLANCE, Natalie. The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, Chicago, p. 36-43, 2005. DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1134271.1134277.
ALLCOTT, Hunt; BOXELL, Levi; CONWAY, Jacob C.; GENTZKOW, Matthew; THALER, Michael; YANG, David Y. Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic (Working Paper No. 26946; Working Paper Series). National Bureau of Economic Research. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w26946.
ALVES, Marcelo. Desarranjo da visibilidade, desordem informacional e polarização no Brasil entre 2013 e 2018. Tese de doutorado defendida no Programa de Pós Graduação em Comunicação da Universidade Federal Fluminense. 2020. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20523.80169
ALVES, Marcelo; ALBUQUERQUE, Afonso. Perda da hegemonia da imprensa: a disputa pela visibilidade na eleição de 2018. Lumina, v. 13, n. 3, p. 5-27, 2019.
ANDRIS, Clio; LEE, David; HAMILTON, Marcus J.; MARTINO, Mauro; GUNNING, Christian E.; SELDEN, John Armistead. The Rise of Partisanship and Super-Cooperators in the U.S. House of Representatives. PLoS ONE, v. 10, n. 4, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123507.
AQUINO BITTENCOURT, Maria Clara. Ciberacontecimento e jornalismo digital: o impacto do compartilhamento e da produção de sentidos nas práticas jornalísticas. Estudos em Jornalismo e Mídia, v 12, n. 2, p. 342-358, jul./dez. 2015.
ARAÚJO, Ronald; OLIVEIRA, Thaiane. A Desinformação e mensagens sobre a hidroxicloroquina no Twitter. SciELO Pré-prints. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1113.
BAIL, Christopher A.; ARGYLE, Lisa P.; BROWN, Taylor W.; BUMPUS, John P.; CHEN, Haohan; HUNZAKER, M. B. Fallin; LEE, Jaemin; MANN, Marcus; MERHOUT, Friedolin; VOLFOVSKY, Alexander. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. PNAS, v. 115, n. 37, p. 9216–9221, 2018.
BAKSHY, Eytan; MESSING, Solomon; ADAMIC, Lada A. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook, Science, v. 348, n. 6239, p. 1130-1132, 2015. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1160.
BARBERÁ, Pablo. How Social Media Reduces Mass Political Polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. Proceedings of the 2015 APSA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 2015. Disponível em: https://convention2.allacademic.com/one/apsa/apsa15/index.php?cmd=Online+Program+View+Paper&selected_paper_id=997865&PHPSESSID=ai1fh85m28gqmu9vd308q3ef6r.
BARBERÁ, Pablo. Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization. In: PERSILY, Nathaniel; TUCKER, Joshua (org.). In: Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field and Prospects for Reform, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. p. 34-55.
BARBERÁ, Pablo; JOST, John T; NAGLER, Jonathan; TUCKER, Joshua A.; BONNEAU, Richard. Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?, Psychological Science, v. 26, n. 10, 1531–1542, 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594620.
BENKLER, Yochai; FARIS, Robert; ROBERTS, Hal. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, disiformation, and radicalization in american politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
BORN, Kelly; EDGINGTON. Analysis of philanthropic opportunities to mitigate the disinformation/propaganda problem. Menlo Park, CA: Hewlett Foundation, 2017.
BRENNEN, Scott; SIMON, Felix; HOWARD, Philip N.; NIELSEN, Rasmus Kleis. Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Oxford: Reuters Institute Factsheet, 2020. Disponível em https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/types-sources-and-claims-covid-19-misinformation.
BLONDEL, Vincent D.; GUILLAUME, Jean-Loup; LAMBIOTTE, Renaud; LEFEBVRE, Etienne. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10), P1000.
BRUNS, A. Are Filter Bubbles Real?. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2019.
BRUNS, Axel; HARRINGTON, Stephen; HURCOMBE, Edward. ‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook. Media International Australia, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20946113.
BRUNS, Axel; MOE, Hallvard. Structural Layers of Communication on Twitter. In: WELLER, Katrin; BRUNS, Axel; BURGESS, Jean; MAHRT, Merja; PUSCHMANN, Cornelius (ed.). Twitter and Society. Nova York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014. p. 15-28.
DEGENNE, Alain; FORSE Michel. Introducing Social Networks. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1999.
DUBOIS, Elizabeth; BLANK, Grant. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, v. 21, n. 5, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
EADY, Gregory; NAGLER, Jonathan; GUESS, Andy; ZILINSKY, Jan; TUCKER, Joshua A. How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data. SAGE Open, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019832705.
FALLIS, Don. What Is Disinformation?. Library Trends, v. 63, n. 3, p. 401-426, 2015.
FLAXMAN, Seth; GOEL, Sharad; RAO, Justin M. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Special Issue, p. 298-320, 2016.
GUILLE, A.; HACID, H.; FAVRE, C.; ZIGHED, D. Information Diffusion in Online Social Networks: A Survey. ACM Sigmod Record, v.42, n. 2, p. 17-28, 2013
GRUZD, Anatoliy; MAI, Philip. Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter. Big Data & Society, v. 7, n. 2, p. 1-9, 2020.
GRUZD, Anatoliy; ROY, Jeffrey. Investigating Political Polarization on Twitter: A Canadian Perspective. Policy and Internet, v. 6, n. 1, p. 28-45, 2014.
GUESS, Andrew; LYONS, Benjamin; NYHAN, Brendan; REIFLER, Jason. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Miami: John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, 2018.
HIMELBOIM, Itai; SMITH, Marc A.; RAINIE, Lee; SCHNEIDERMAN, Ben; ESPINA, Camila. Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, p. 1-13, jan./mar. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691545.
JACK, Caroline. Lexicon of Lies: Terms for Problematic Information. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, 2017.
JENKINS, H.; FORD, S.; GREEN, J. Spreadable Media. New York: NYU Press, 2013.
LARSSON, Anders Olof. News Use as Amplification – Norwegian National, Regional and Hyperpartisan Media on Facebook. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, v. 96, p. 3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019831439.
MAIA, Rousiley C. M. Visibilidade midiática e deliberação pública. In: GOMES, Wilson; MAIA, Rousiley C. M. Comunicação e democracia: Problemas & Perspectivas. São Paulo: Paulus, 2008. p. 117-162.
MAIREDER, Axel; AUSSERHOFER, Julian. Political Discourses on Twitter: Networking Topics, Objects, and People. In: WELLER, Katrin; BRUNS, Axel; BURGESS, Jean; MAHRT, Merja; PUSCHMANN, Cornelius (ed.). Twitter and Society. Nova York: Peter Lang Publishing, 2014. p. 305-318.
MARWICK, Alice; LEWIS, Rebecca. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online. New York: Data & Society Research Institute, 2017.
MOURÃO, Rachel R.; ROBERTSON, Craig T. Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information. Journalism Studies, v.20, n. 14, p. 2077-2095, 2019.
PAPAKYRIAKOPOULOS, Orestis; SERRANO, Juan Carlos Median; HEGELICH, Simon. The spread of COVID-19 conspiracy theories on social media and the effect of content moderation. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-034.
RECUERO, Raquel; ARAÚJO, Ricardo; ZAGO, Gabriela. How does Social Capital affect Retweets?. Proceedings of International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, V, Barcelona, Spain: AAAI, 2011.
RECUERO, Raquel; SOARES, Felipe. O Discurso Desinformativo sobre a Cura do COVID-19 no Twitter: Estudo de caso. E-Compós, 2020. Pré-print SciELO: https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/84/1022.
RECUERO, Raquel; SOARES, Felipe Bonow; GRUZD, Anatoliy. Hyperpartisanship, Disinformation and Political Conversations on Twitter: The Brazilian Presidential Election of 2018. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14(1), p. 569-578, 2020.
RECUERO, Raquel; ZAGO, Gabriela; SOARES, Felipe Bonow. Mídia social e filtros-bolha nas conversações políticas no Twitter. In: Encontro Anual da Compós, XXVI, 2017. Faculdade Cásper Líbero, São Paulo. Anais... São Paulo: Compós, 2017a. Disponível em http://www.compos.org.br/data/arquivos_2017/trabalhos_arquivo_XH5ITTDY1PYGE7PDUQJM_26_5374_18_02_2017_12_53_33.pdf.
SMITH, Marc; RAINIE, Lee; HIMELBOIM, Itai; SHNEIDERMAN, Ben. Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2014.
SOARES, Felipe Bonow; RECUERO, Raquel; ZAGO, Gabriela. Influencers in Polarized Political Networks on Twitter. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Media & Society, Copenhagen, Denmark (SMSociety), 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3217804.3217909.
SOARES, Felipe Bonow; VIEGAS, Paula; SUDBRACK, Shana; RECUERO, Raquel; HÜTTNER, Luiz Ricardo. Desinformação e esfera pública no Twitter: disputas discursivas sobre o assassinato de Marielle Franco. Revista Fronteiras - estudos midiáticos, v. 21, n. 3, p. 2-14. DOI: 10.4013/fem.2019.213.01.
SOCIAL FEED MANAGER. George Washington University Libraries. (2016). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.597278
SUNSTEIN, Cass. Echo Chambers. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
TUCKER, Joshua Aaron; GUESS, Andrew; BARBERA, Pablo; VACCARI, Cristian; SIEGEL, Alexandra; SANOVICH, Sergey; STUKAL, Denis; NYHAN, Brendan. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. Menlo Park, CA: Hewlett Foundation, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139.
USCINSKI, Joseph E.; ENDERS, Adam M.; KLOFSTAD, Casey; SEELIG, Michelle; FUNCHION, John; EVERETT, Caleb; WUCHTY, Stephan; PREMARATNE, Kamal; MURTHI, Manohar.Uscinski, Joseph E.; Enders, Adam M.; Klofstad, Casey A.; Seelig, Michelle I.; Funchion, John, R.; Everett, Caleb; Wuchty, Stephan; Premaratne, Kamal; Murthi, Manohar, N. (2020). Why do people believe COVID-19 conspiracy theories?. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015.
WARDLE, Claire. Understanding Information Disorder. Brighton: First Draft, 2019.
WARDLE, Claire; DERAKHSHAN, Hossein. Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2017.
WASSERMAN, Stanley; FAUST, Katherine. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Appliccations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
ZAGO, Gabriela; BASTOS, Marco Toledo. Visibilidade de Notícias no Twitter e no Facebook: Análise Comparativa das Notícias mais Repercutidas na Europa e nas Américas. Brazilian Journalism Research, v. 9, n. 1, p. 116-133, 2013.
ZAGO, G. Circulação e recirculação de narrativas do acontecimento no jornalismo em rede: a Copa do Mundo de 2014 no Twitter. Tese (Doutorado em Comunicação e Informação), Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2014.
##submission.downloads##
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista Contracampo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Os autores retêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicar o seu trabalho pela primeira vez sob a licença Creative Commons (CC-BY), que permite o intercâmbio de obras e reconhecimento de autoria na revista.
