CAPACIDADE DA AGREGAÇÃO: COMPROMISSOS, ÁGUA E UMA FORMA DE CUIDADO COLETIVO NO NORDESTE DO BRASIL / CAPACITY AS AGGREGATION: PROMISES, WATER AND A FORM OF COLLECTIVE CARE IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL/ CAPACIDAD DE AGREGACIÓN: COMPROMISOS, AGUA Y UNA FORMA DE CUIDADO COLECTIVO EN EL NORESTE DE BRASIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v0i0.630Palavras-chave:
Agregação, Brasil, Coletivos, Futuro, Forma política, Compromissos, Água./ Keywords, Aggregation, Brazil, Collectives, Future, Political form, Promises, Water./ Palabras clave, Agregación, Colectivo, Compromisos, Agua.Resumo
CAPACIDADE DA AGREGAÇÃO: COMPROMISSOS, ÁGUA E UMA FORMA DE CUIDADO COLETIVO NO NORDESTE DO BRASIL
Resumo: No transcurso do Século XXI, as pessoas vêm fazendo experimentações com diferentes formas de organização política. No nordeste do Brasil, esse espírito experimental levou à criação do Pacto das Águas, um processo envolvendo mais de oito mil participantes reunidos em uma série de audiências públicas[1]nas quais foram realizados compromissos de zelar pela água, observando as especificidades do contexto local. O Pacto reuniu estas promessas em um formato escalonado o qual, acreditam os organizadores, irá proporcionar os meios necessários para lidar com as questões estatais relativas à água. O Pacto romperia com uma história de fracassos infraestruturais e legais concernentes ao acesso às águas subterrâneas no estado do Ceará. Este artigo examina a forma como este coletivo foi produzido, quais foram suas unidades constitutivas e como a lógica da agregação conduziu as práticas que levaram à sua compilação. Meu objetivo é reexaminar o coletivo como uma forma de competência quantitativa que deve ser qualitativamente reconsiderada.
CAPACITY AS AGGREGATION: PROMISES, WATER AND A FORM OF COLLECTIVE CARE IN NORTHEAST BRAZIL
Abstract: As the twenty-first century gets underway, people have been experimenting with many forms of political organization. In Northeast Brazil, that experimental spirit led to the creation of the Water Pact, a process involving more than eight thousand participants through a series of public promise-making rituals in which they made pledges to care for water, attending to the specificities of their own context. The Pact gathered those promises into a multi-scalar formation that, the organizers believed, would yield the necessary resources to address the state’s water problems. The Pact would break with an unsuccessful history of infrastructural and legal reforms concerning deep-water access in the state of Ceará. This article examines how that collective was produced, what its constituent units were and how the logic of aggregation guided practices leading to its coalescence. My purpose is to re-examine the aggregate as a quantitative form of capacity that should be qualitatively reconsidered.
CAPACIDAD DE AGREGACIÓN: COMPROMISOS, AGUA Y UNA FORMA DE CUIDADO COLECTIVO EN EL NORESTE DE BRASIL
Resumen: En el transcurso del siglo XXI, la gente ha estado experimentando con diferentes formas de organización política. En el noreste de Brasil, este espíritu experimental llevó a la creación del Pacto de las Aguas, un proceso que involucró a más de ocho mil participantes reunidos en una serie de audiencias públicas [1] en las que se asumieron compromisos para velar por el agua, observando las especificidades del contexto local. . El Pacto reunió estas promesas en un formato escalonado que, según creen los organizadores, proporcionará los medios necesarios para abordar los problemas estatales del agua. El Pacto rompería con una historia de fallas legales y de infraestructura relacionadas con el acceso al agua subterránea en el estado de Ceará. Este artículo examina cómo se produjo este colectivo, cuáles fueron sus unidades constitutivas y cómo la lógica de agregación condujo a las prácticas que llevaron a su compilación. Mi objetivo es reexaminar el colectivo como una forma de competencia cuantitativa que debe reconsiderarse cualitativamente.
Downloads
Referências
ABRAM, S.; WESZKALNYS, G. AnthropologiesofPlanning: Temporality, Imagination,andEthnography. Focaal, 61: 3–18, 2011.
AIYER, A. TheAllureoftheTransnational: Notes on Some Aspects of the Political Economy of Water in India. Cultural Anthropology 22 (4): 640–658, doi:10.1525/can.2007.22.4.640, 2007.
ANAND, N. Pressure: ThePoliTechnicsofWaterSupply in Mumbai .CulturalAnthropology, 26 (4): 542–564. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01111.x, 2011.
ANDERSON, B. ImaginedCommunities: ReflectionsontheOriginsand Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso, 1991.
ANDERSON, C. W. WhatAggregators Do: Rhetoric, PracticesandCulturesof Digital andAnalogEvidence in Web-EraJournalism. Paperreadatthe 12th InternationalSymposium for Online Journalism, Austin, 2011.
ARONS, N. G. Waitingfor Rain: ThePoliticsandPoetryofDrought in NortheastBrazil.Tucson: Universityof Arizona Press, 2004.
ASSEMBLEIA LEGISLATIVA DO ESTADO DO CEARÁ; CONSELHO DE ALTOS ESTUDOS E ASSUNTOS ESTRATÉGICOS.Plano Estratégico dos Recursos Hídricos do Ceará. Ceará: Fortaleza, 2009.
BAKKER, K.A PoliticalEcologyofWaterPrivatization. Studies in Political Economy, 70:35–58, 2010.
BALLESTERO, A.Transparency Short-Circuited: LaughterandNumbers in Costa RicanWaterPolitics. PoLAR: Politicaland Legal AnthropologyReview, 35 (2): 223–241, 2012.
BALLESTERO, A. ‘TheEthicsof a Formula: Calculating a Financial-HumanitarianPriceforWater’. American Ethnologist 42 (1): 262–278, 2015.
BARNES, J. Cultivating the Nile: The Everyday Politics of Water in Egypt. Durham, NC:DukeUniversityPress, 2014.
BARTH, F. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston, MA: Little Press, 1998.
BHABHA, H. K. The LocationofCulture. London: Routledge, 1994.
BORCHARDT, W. G.;DAILEYAND, J. S.; NUNES, P. F. New Paths toGrowth: The Age of Aggregation. Outlook: The Journalof High-Performance Business Issue 3: 19–27, 2011.
CAPRARA, A., J.; LIMA, Wellington de Oliveira;MARINHO, A.Correia Pequeno;CALVASINA, P. Gondim; LANDIM L. Paes; SOMMERFELD, J. Irregular WaterSupply, HouseholdUsageand Dengue: A Bio-socialStudy in the BrazilianNortheast. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 25 (1): S125–S136, 2009.
CARSE, A.Nature as Infrastructure: Making and Managing the Panama Canal Watershed. Social Studies of Science 42 (4): 539–563, 2012.
CODDINGTON, M. A.Telling Second hand Stories:News Aggregation and the Production of Journalistic Knowledge. Ph.D. diss., Universityof Texas at Austin, 2015.
COLLIER, S. J.; ONG, A. Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems. In: ONG, A.;COLLIER, S. J. (eds). Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as AnthropologicalProblems. Malden: Blackwell, 3–21, 2005.
DO AMARAL FILHO, J. Reformas Estruturais e Economia Politica dos Recursos Hidricos no Ceara. Fortaleza, CE: SEPLAN-IPECE, 2003.
FINAN, T. J.; NELSON, D. R. Making Rain, Making Roads, Making Do: Public and Private Adaptations to Drought in Ceará, Northeast Brazil. Climate Research 19 (2):97–108,2001.
FOUCAULT, M. Discipline andPunish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books, 1975.
GARCIA, A. ThePromise: On the Morality of the Marginal and the Illicit. Ethos 42 (1):51–64, 1975, 2014.
GENNEP, A. van.The Rites of Passage. Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 1960.
GROSZ, E. The Nick of Time: Politics, Evolution, and the Untimely. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004. GUYER, J. I. Anthropology:The Study of Social and Cultural Originality. African Sociological Review/Revue Africaine de Sociologie 3 (2): 30–53, 1999.
HARAWAY, D. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. In D. Haraway (ed.), The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge, 223–250, 2004.
HARDT, M.; NEGRI, A. Multitude: WarandDemocracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin, 2005.
HAYDEN, C. When Nature Goes Public: The Making and Unmaking of Bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton: Princeton UniversityPress, 2003.
HOBBES, T. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1651] 1991.
JURIS, J. S. Reflectionson #OccupyEverywhere: Social Media, PublicSpace, and EmergingLogicsof Aggregation. American Ethnologist 39 (2): 259–279, 2012.
LATOUR, B. Reassemblingthe Social: AnIntroductiontoActor-Network Theory, Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
LEMOS, M. C. A Tale of Two Policies: The Politics of Climate Fore casting and Drought Relief in Ceara, Brazil. PolicySciences 36: 101–123, 2003.
MALINOWSKI, B. CrimeandCustom in SavageSociety. The Gift. New York: W. W. Norton, [1926] 1966.
MIYAZAKI, H. The Methodof Hope. Stanford: Stanford UniversityPress, 2004.
MORITA,A.InfrastructuringAmphibiousSpace:TheInterplayofAquaticandTerrestrialInfrastructures in theChaoPhraya Delta in Thailand. Science as Culture 25 (1): 117–140, 2016.
MOSSE, D.TheRuleofWater: Statecraft, EcologyandCollectiveAction in South India.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
NELSON, D. R.; FINAN, T. J. Prayingfor Drought: PersistentV ulnerabilityand the Politics of Patronage in Ceará, NortheastBrazil. American Anthropologist 111 (3):302–316, 2009.
PHILIPS, A. List. In: LURYAND, C.;WAKEFORD, N. (eds). InventiveMethods: The Happening ofthe Social. London: Routledge, 96–109, 2012.
RABINOW, P. Marking Time: OntheAnthropologyoftheContemporary. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.
RUPPERT, E. The GovernmentalTopologiesof DatabaseDevices. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5): 116–136. doi: 10.1177/0263276412439428, 2012.
SIMPSON, L. D. IntegratedWaterResources Management, Ceara, Brazil. Washington,DC: World Bank, 2003.
STRATHERN, M. Cuttingthe Network. Journalofthe Royal AnthropologicalInstitute N.S.(2): 517–535, 1996
STRATHERN, M. AnthropologicalReasoning: Some Threads ofThought. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (3): 23–37, 2014.
TURNER, V. The Ritual Process: StructureandAnti-Structure. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995.
VERRAN, H. Science and African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.
VON SCHNITZLER, A. Democracy’s Infrastructure: Techno-PoliticsandProtestafter Apartheid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2016.
WEST, P. Conservation Is Our Government Now: The PoliticsofEcology in Papua New Guinea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.
