CREDIBILIDAD SOCIAL Y COALICIONES GUBERNAMENTALES EN LA CONSTRUCCIÓN INSTITUCIONAL Y GUBERNAMENTAL EN LA RUMANÍA POSCOMUNISTA

INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION AND GOVERNANCE IN POST-COMMUNIST ROMANIA

Autores/as

  • Andrei Taranu Political Science Faculty National School on Political Studies and Public Administration. Bucharest Romania
  • Cristian Pîrvulescu PhD, Professor at the National School of Political Studies and Public Administration (Bucharest, Romania).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v3i6.138

Palabras clave:

Credibilidade, Democracia, Constituição, Instituições, Confiança, , Credibility, Democracy, Constitution, Institutions, Trust, Credibilidad, Constitución, Instituciones, Confianza

Resumen

Resumen: El artículo pretende analizar la situación política actual de Rumanía, haciendo hincapié en el factor de confianza institucional, que viene sufriendo un fuerte retroceso en el escenario nacional e internacional. Además, aporta, para el debate, características intrínsecas al Derecho Constitucional de ese país. Comparamos la situación actual de la nación en relación con otras repúblicas europeas, además de analizar los problemas sociales, económicos y políticos que afligen a la democracia del Estado rumano, que actúan para debilitar el sistema electoral. Aún así, se discute la capacidad de la Carta Magna para enfrentar tales disputas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

AGNEW, John. Globalization and Sovereignty. New York: Rowman and Littelfield, 2009.

ALDRIN, Philippe. L’invention de l’opinion publique europenne.Politix, Revue de sciences

sociales du politique, 2010.

BOHNET, I., FREY, B. S., HUCK, S. American Political Science Review, 95 (1),2001, p. 131.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. L’opinion publique n’existe pas.Les Temps modernes, n°318, janvier

, pp. 1292-1309.

BULAI, A. EJST, 8 (suppl.1), 2012, p. 113.

CONNOR, Steven. Cultura postmodernă, Bucureşti: Meridiane, 1999, p. 85.

CROUCH, Colin. Post-democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge, 2004, p. 19-22.

DAHL, Robert. Poliarhiile. IaÅŸi, Institutul European, 2000, p. 46.

DALTON, R. J. International Review in Sociology, 15, 2005, p. 133.

DIEGO, Gambetta. Can We trust?. In:DIEGO, Gambetta (editor).Trust: making and breaking

cooperative relations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford and New York, 1988, p. 213.

DISKIN, Abraham ; DISKIN, Hanna; HAZAN, Reuven Y. Why Democracies Collapse:

The Reasons for Democratic Failure and Success, International Political Science Review, Vol

, n. 3, 2005.

DUHAMEL, Olivier. Les démocraties. Paris: Seuil, 1996, p. 275-278.

DUVERGER, Maurice. A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government,

European Journal of Political Research, vol. 8, n°2, 1980.

DUVERGER, Maurice. Les regimes politiques. Paris: PUF, 1981, p. 7.

ELIADE, Mircea. Itinerariu spiritual:Tânăra generaÅ£ie. In: Profetism românesc, Roza

Vânturilor, Bucure ti, 1990, p. 11. È™

FUKUYAMA, Francis. Trust, The social virtues and the creation of prosperity, Free Press

Paperbacks, NY, 1995.

HOROWITZ, Donald. Comparing Democratic Systems.In: Journal of Democracy,n. 1, 1990.

HUNTINGTON, Samuel P. Ordinea politică a societăţilor în schimbare, Iaşi, Polirom, 1999,

/Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven and London, Yale University Press, p.

JAKAB, Andras; SONNEVED, Pal. Une continuité imparfaite: la nouvelle Constitution

hongroise.JusPolitcum, no. 8, 2012.

LASCOMBE, Michel. Le soleil a rendez-vous avec la lune: quel réaménagement des pouvoirs

entre le Président de la République et le Premier ministre? Droit public, Numéro spécial, 1/2

, Paris, LGDJ, 2002, p. 234.

LINZ, Juan. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Europe, Baltimore, Johns

Hopkins University Press, 1978;

______. The Perils of Presidentialism, Journal of Democracy, 1, 1990;

______. i„ ș Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference?In:LINZ,

Juan J.;VALENZUELA, Arturo. (eds.).The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore,

Johns Hopkins University Press. 1994 tradusă i î È™ n române te în 2010 la CAPublishing, Cluj- È™

Napoca.

MAINWARING, Scott. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult

Combination",Comparative Political Studies, No 26, 1993

MAIORESCU, Titus. ÃŽn contra direcÅ£iei de astăzi în cultura româna(1868).Critice, Editura

Minerva, BucureÅŸti, 1984.

NORRIS, P. Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance, Oxford University

Press, Oxford, 1999, p. 96.

OLSON, Mancur. Creşterea şi declinul naţiunilor. Bucureşti, Humanitas, 1999, p. 29-30.

ORVISKA, M;HUDSON, J. European Journal of Political Economy, 19, 2002, p. 83.

PUTNAM, R., LEONARDI, R., NANNETTI, R. Cum functioneaza democratia? Polirom,

Ia i, 2001. È™

QUERMONNE, Jean-Louis. Les regimes politiques Occidentaux, Paris, Seuil, 1986, p, 12.

RAPORTUL FORUMULUI CONSTITU IONAL, Asocia Ț ția Pro Democrația, 2013.

SAMUELS, David J.; SHUGART, Matthew. La nomination et la révocation du premier

ministre en régime semi-présidentiel l’impact de la présidentialisation des partis. Revue

Internationale de Politique Comparée, Vol. 17, n. 1, 2010.

SARTORI, Giovanni. Sul sistema constituzionale romeno.Studia Politica, Vol. I, 1, 2002.

SHUGART, Matthew; CAREY, John. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design

and Electoral Dynamics. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

STEPAN, Alfred; SKACH, Cindy. Preziden ialismul i parlamentarismul într-o perspectivă ț ș

comparată.In:LINZ, Juan;VALENZUELA, Arturo.Eș ț ț ecul democra iei preziden iale, apărură

în engleză în 1994 i tradusă î È™ n române te în 2010 la CAPublishing, Cluj-Napoca.

WALTER, B. Interpersonal Trust – Attempt of a Definition, Scientific report, Technische

Universität München, 2010.

Publicado

2017-01-31 — Actualizado el 2021-03-30

Versiones