CONSTITUTION CONTRE CITOYENNETÉ: 

AMBIGUITÉS ET ANTAGONISMES DANS LE CONSTITUTIONNALISME NORD-AMÉRICAIN

Auteurs-es

  • Marco Casamasso Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v6i15.901

Mots-clés :

Constituição e cidadania, Cidadania e direito positivo, Suprema Corte norte-americana.../Keywords, Constitution and citizenship, Citizenship and positive law, U.S. Supreme Court.../Palabras clave, Constitución y ciudadanía, Ciudadanía y derecho positivo..

Résumé

Résumé: L'article vise à proposer des éléments de réflexion autour de la relation complexe entre la citoyenneté et la Constitution. Contrairement aux approches juridiques traditionnelles, la présente étude privilégie les ambiguïtés, les tensions et les conflits qui surgissent entre, d'une part, les demandes de garantie et d'élargissement des droits de citoyenneté et, d'autre part, la Constitution. Compte tenu de sa pertinence dans le scénario du constitutionnalisme moderne, il a été décidé de délimiter l'objet de l'enquête à l'expérience constitutionnelle nord-américaine. La proposition de travail a été élaborée en trois étapes. Dans un premier temps, une critique de la perspective juridique de la citoyenneté est proposée, soulignant ses limites face aux revendications sociales et aux conflits pour l'expansion des droits fondamentaux. Ensuite, l'antagonisme possible entre la Constitution et la citoyenneté est mis en évidence. La dernière étape consiste à présenter des aspects de la Constitution des États-Unis qui sont réfractaires à la citoyenneté et un exemple de décisions inéquitables de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, au détriment des citoyens. Malgré sa pertinence, il y a peu de production académique consacrée au problème de l'antagonisme entre la Constitution et la citoyenneté.

Téléchargements

Les données sur le téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Marco Casamasso, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF

Doutor em Direito do Estado (PUC-SP) e Mestre em Teoria do Estado e da Constituição (PUC-Rio). Professor Associado do Curso de Direito da Universidade Federal Fluminense – UFF – em Volta Redonda-RJ, e Coordenador do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito Constitucional – PPGDC-UFF.

Références

BALKIN, Jack. The meaning of constituional tragedy. In: ESKRIDGE, William Jr.; LEVINSON, Sanford. Constitutional stupdities, constitutional tragedies. New York: New York, 1998, p. 121-128.

CHEMERINSKY, Erwin. The case against the Supreme Court. New York: Penguin Books, 2014.

DENQUIN, Jean Marie. Citoynneté. In: ALLAND, Denis; RIALS, Stéphane. Dictionnaire de la Culture Juridique. Paris: Quadrige/PUF, 2003, p. 198-200.

ESKRIDGE, William Jr.; LEVINSON, Sanford. Constitutional stupdities, constitutional tragedies. New York: New York, 1998.

FERRAJOLI, Luigi. A soberania no mundo modeno. São Paulo, Martins Fontes: 2002.

FLEMING, James. Constitutional tragedy in dying: or whose tragedy is it, anyway? In: ESKRIDGE, William Jr.; LEVINSON, Sanford. Constitutional stupdities, constitutional tragedies. New York: New York, 1998, p. 162-171.

GAILLE, Marie. Le citoyen. Paris: Flamarion, 1998.

GRABER, Mark A. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

HAMILTON, Alexander; MADISON, James; JAY, John. El Federalista. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. 2014.

HENKIN, Louis. A new birth of constitutionalism: influences and genetic defects. In: ROSENFELD, Michel (Ed.). Constitutionalism, identity, difference, and legitimacy. Theoretical Perspectives. Druham: Duke University Press, 1994, p. 39-53.

ISIN, Engin ; TURNER, Bryan. Citizenship Studies: An Introduction. ISIN, Engin ; TURNER, Bryan (Eds.). In: Handbook of citizenship studies. London: Sage, 2002, p. 4-9.

JAUME, Lucien. Citoyenneté. L’homme et le citoyen. In: RAYNAUD, Philippe; RIALS, Stéphane (dirs.) Dictionnaire de philosophie politique. 3.ed. Paris: Quadrige/PUF, 2003, p. 96-99.

KEYSSAR, Alexander. The right to vote. The contested history of democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books, 2000.

KELSEN, Hans. Teoria Geral do direito e do Estado. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.

LECA, Jean. Citoyen. In: DUHAMEL, Olivier; MÉNY, Yves. Dictionnaire constittutionell. Paris: PUF, 1992, p. 143-146.

LEYDET, Dominique. Citizenship. In: Encyclopedia of Stanford [on line]. Fall 2017. Disponível em: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/citizenship/>. Acesso em: 14.fev.2020.

MINDUS, Patricia. The Contemporary Debate on Citizenship. Some Remarks on the Erased of Slovenia. Revus [Online], 9. 2009, Online since 20 . Dez.2011. Disponível em: http://journals.openedition.org/revus/425. Acesso em: 23.nov.2019

NEUMAN. Citizenship. In: TUSHNET, Mark; GRABER, Mark; LEVINSON, Sanford. The Oxford Handbook of the U.S. Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015, p. 587-606.

RASKIN, Jamin B. Legal aliens, local citizens: the historical, contittuional and theoretical meanings of allien suffrage. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Philadelphia, Vol. 141, no. 4, p. 1391-1470, abr. 1993.

REDDICK, Gavin J. Eugenic sterelization. FINKELMAN, Paul (Ed.) Encyclopedia of American civil liberties. New York: Routledge, 2006, p. 545-546.

ROBERTS, Dorothy. The meaning of Blacks’ Fidelity to the Constitution. In: ESKRIDGE, William Jr.; LEVINSON, Sanford. Constitutional stupdities, constitutional tragedies. New York: New York, 1998, p. 226-234.

SMITH, Rogers. Civic ideals. Conflict visions of citizenship in U. S. history. New Haven: Yale University Press: 1999.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. A Constituição parcial. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey, 2009.

LEGISLAÇÃO E JURISPRUDÊNCIA

BRASIL. Constituição dos Estados Unidos do Brasil, de 10 de novembro de 1937;

Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao37.htm Acesso em: 19.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986.)

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/478/186/.Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/#tab-opinion-1948083

Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/#tab-opinion-1940809. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/274/200/#tab-opinion-1931809 Acesso em: 10.jan.2020.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951)

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/341/494/#tab-opinion-1940191. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/60/393/#tab-opinion-1964281. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/558/#tab-opinion-1961305

Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874).

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/88/162/

Acesso em: 13.fev.2020.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/537/#tab-opinion-1917401. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/316/535/#tab-opinion-1937467. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957)

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/354/298/#tab-opinion-1941557. Acesso em: 12.dez.2019.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1 (2010). Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/561/1/#tab-opinion-1963362 . Acesso em: 13.fev.2020.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. The Constitution of the United States. The Bill of Rights & all amendments. Disponível em: https://constitutionus.com/. Acesso em: 13.fev.2020.

UNIÃO SOVIÉTICA. Constitution (Fundamental law) of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. With Ammendments and Additions adopted by the First, Second, Third, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Sessions of the Supreme Soviet of the U.S.S.R.

Disponível em: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1936/12/05.htm Acesso em: 13.fev.2020.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Supreme Court. Pope v. Williams, 193 U.S. 621.

Disponível em: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/193/621/. Acesso em: 13.fev.2020.

Publié-e

2020-04-14 — Mis(e) à jour 2021-03-31

Versions