The effects of familiarity as a pragmatic variable in metaphorical sentence processing

Authors

  • Eduardo Kenedy Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, RJ, Brasil
  • Gladiston Silva Universidade Federal Fluminense. Niterói, RJ, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v29i64.60477.pt

Keywords:

Psicolinguística, Processamento, Metáfora, Pragmática, Familiaridade

Abstract

Conventionality is usually considered the main operating variable in metaphorical sentence processing. This article argues that familiarity is actually the determining pragmatic factor in regular understanding of nominal metaphors of the type as “X is a Y”. Authors such as Searle (1979), Gibbs (1981), Janus and Bever (1985), Glucksberg (1988 and 2003), Bowdle and Gentner (2005) and Ricci (2016) manipulated conventionality as a fundamental variable in their experimental studies. They’ve ignored familiarity effects. It is within this context, and by contrast with it, that the present study is addressed. An online self-paced reading experiment with metaphorical sentences presented without prior context was applied and revealed that familiarity was the only variable with any a significant effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BOWDLE, Brian F.; GENTNER, Dedre. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, v. 112, n. 1, p. 193-216, 2005.

CLARK, Herbert; LUCY, Peter. Understanding what is meant from what is said: A study in conversationally conveyed request. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, v. 14, n. 1, p. 335-359, 1975.

GIBBS, Raymond W. Jr. Your wish is my command: Convention and context in interpreting indirect request. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, v. 20, n. 4, p. 435-444, 1981.

GLUCKSBERG, Sam. The Psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, v. 7, n. 2, p. 92-96, 2003.

GLUCKSBERG, Sam. Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science, v. 7, n. 2, p. 39-43, 1998.

JANUS, Raizi; BEVER, Thomas. Processing of metaphoric language: an investigation of the three-stage model of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 14, n. 5, p. 473-487, 1985.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metáforas da vida cotidiana. Tradução de Mara Sophia Zanatta. Campinas: Mercado das Letras; São Paulo: Editora da PUC-SP, 2002 [1980].

RICCI, Adiel Queiroz. O processamento psicolinguístico da metáfora: um estudo experimental no PB. 2016. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos de Linguagem) – Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2016.

SEARLE, John. Metaphor. In: ORTONY, Andrew. Metaphor and thought. 2nd edition. New York. Cambridge University Press, 1993 [1979]. p. 83-111

SILVA, Gladiston Alves Da. A interferência da familiaridade no processamento de metáfora no PB. 2018. Dissertação (Mestrado em Estudos de Linguagem) – Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2018.

SILVA, Gladiston Alves da. Psicolinguística da metáfora: o processamento da familiaridade em PB. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Estudos de Linguagem) – Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, 2022

Published

2024-08-05

How to Cite

Kenedy, E., & Silva, G. (2024). The effects of familiarity as a pragmatic variable in metaphorical sentence processing. Gragoatá, 29(64), e60477. https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v29i64.60477.pt