The role of court of appeals judges in the state of Rio Grande do Sul in incidents for privileged trafficking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/antropolitica.i.a57890Keywords:
Drug policy, Drug trafficking, Privileged drug traffic, Privileging, Law no. 11.343/06.Abstract
This work aims to understand the way in which judges in the state of Rio Grande do Sul apply the benefit represented in art. 33, §4th, of Law No. 11,343/06, which constitutes the conduct of privileged trafficking and provides for the possibility of a reduction of one-sixth to two-thirds of the sentence. To this end, an analysis was carried out of 420 rulings referring to appeals filed at the Court of Justice of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, filed with the aim of applying the privilege and judged by the first three criminal chambers, during the year 2019. The methodology adopted to evaluate the data was quantitative, based on the analysis of several variables. Regarding the research problem, the question is whether second-degree judges are acting in a punitive manner and denying the privileger’s right to benefit, as first-degree judges do, or whether, in the second degree, there is a rupture in these actions of the magistrates. As a result, it was found that although the legislation determines four conditions for the recognition of privileged trafficking – being a first-time offender, with a good record, not involved in criminal activities nor a member of a criminal organization – the judges of the first and second chambers made use of 21 extralegal reasons to deny the benefit to the privileged party, while the Third Party used only two. This demonstrates the distinction between the chambers’ understanding of how the law should be applied, highlighting internal disputes in the field of Judiciary and the legal uncertainty faced by those accused of privileged trafficking.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Girardi Hypolito
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
O conteúdo da revista Antropolítica, em sua totalidade, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons de atribuição CC-BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt).
De acordo com a licença os seguintes direitos são concedidos:
- Compartilhar – copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato;
- Adaptar – remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial;
- O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição – Você deve informar o crédito adequado, fornecer um link para a licença e indicar se alterações foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer maneira razoável, mas de modo algo que sugira que o licenciante o apoia ou aprova seu uso;
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.