Uma espada de dois gumes: abordagens conceituais da participação no movimento antidemocrático após as eleições presidenciais brasileiras de 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/contracampo.v43i2.59707Keywords:
participação, democracia, golpe de 8 de janeiro, tweets, livro de códigoAbstract
This article proposes a theoretical reflection on the limits of the concept of participation and its eventual political instrumentalization in a democratic environment. The thoughts of Arnstein (1969); Carpentier (2011); Sharp (2017) and Melo et al. (2019) form the basis of the literature review. In addition, a descriptive case study was conducted, whose object of study is the participation of people on Twitter in the actions of denouncing the coup attempt on January 8th in Brasília. While the results of the literature review point out that the variety of historical, social and political conjunctures is an obstacle to a unique understanding of participation and its relationship with the media; the case study suggests that the participation of Brazilian citizens on Twitter is complex, presenting traits of interaction, power sharing and negative participation.
Downloads
References
ABBOTT, Andrew. Methods of Discovery – Heuristic for the Social Sciences. Nova York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004.
ALMOND, Gabriel, VERBA, Sidney. The civic culture. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1965.
ARNSTEIN, Sherry. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. J. Am. Inst. Plann, v. 35, p. 37-41, 1995.
BATISTA, Ariel. O revisionismo utilizado como política de governo pelo bolsonarismo. Cadernos de Pesquisa do CDHIS, v. 34, n.2, p. 128-155, jul./dez.2021.
BRASIL. [Constituição (1988)]. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 2016. 496 p. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm Acesso em: 01 ago.2023.
CARPENTIER, Nico; MELO, Ana Duarte; RIBEIRO, Fábio. Resgatar a participação: para uma crítica sobre o lado oculto do conceito. Comunicação e sociedade, n. 36, p. 17-35, out/dez. 2019.
CARPENTIER, Nico. Além da escada da participação: Ferramentas analíticas para a análise crítica dos processos midiáticos participativos. Mídia e Cotidiano, Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Mídia e Cotidiano, v. 12, n. 3, p. 245-274, out/dez. 2018
CORNWALL, Andrea. Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse. Development in Practice, v. 17, n. 4-5, p. 471-484, 2007.
DAHL, Robert. A Democracia Madisoniana. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 1989
FOUCAULT, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London and New York. 1991.
GELBER, Katharine. Differentiating hate speech: a systemic discrimination approach. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, v.24, n.4, p. 1-22, 2019.
ILANY TZUR, Naama; ZALMANSON, Lior; OESTREICHER-SINGER, Gal. The Dark Side of User Participation-The Effect of Calls to Action on Trust and Information Revelation, 10 set.2021. Disponível em https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2814903. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2023.
HUESCA, Robert. Tracing the history of participatory communication approaches to development: A critical appraisal. Communication for Development and Social Change, v. 180, 2008.
HYMAN, Louis; TOHILL, Joseph (Ed.). Shopping for change: consumer activism and the possibilities of purchasing power. Cornell University Press, 2017.
QUANDT, Thorsten; KLAPPROTH, Johanna; FRISCHLICH, Lena. Dark social media participation and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, v. 45, p. 101-1026, 2022.
LYCARIÃO, Diogenes; SAMPAIO, Rafael Cardoso. Análise de Conteúdo Categorial: manual de aplicação. Coleção Metodologias de Pesquisa. Brasília: Enap, 2021.
LUTZ, Christoph; HOFFMANN, Christian Pieter. The dark side of online participation: exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information, Communication & Society, v. 20, n. 6, p. 876-897, 2017.
MARTINS, Sérgio. Desenvolvimento local: questões conceituais e metodológicas. Revista Internacional de Desenvolvimento Local, v. 3, n. 5, set. 2002.
PATEMAN, Carole. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
RECUERO, Raquel. Contribuições da Análise de Redes Sociais para o estudo das redes sociais na Internet: o caso da hashtag# Tamojuntodilma e# CalaabocaDilma. Revista Fronteiras, v. 16, n. 2, 2014.
RECUERO, Raquel. Introdução à análise de redes sociais online. Salvador: Repositorium UFBA, 2017.
SHARP, L., & Connelly, S. (2018). Theorising participation: pulling down the ladder. Planning in the UK, p. 33-63. Routledge.
SPONHOLZ, Liriam. O papel dos discursos de ódio (online) na ascensão da extrema direita: um aporte teórico. Confluências| Revista Interdisciplinar De Sociologia E Direito, v. 22, n. 3, p. 220-243, 2020.
TUFEKCI, Zeynep. Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press, 2017.
WELDON, Steven; DALTON, Russell. Democratic structures and democratic participation: the limits of consensualism theory. Elections and Democracy: Representation and Accountability. Oxfod: Oxford University Press. p. 113-131, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 RAQUEL EVANGELISTA, Flaviano Quaresma
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish their work for the first time under the Creative Commons licence, which allows the exchange of academic work and recognition of authorship in the journal.