LITIGÂNCIA CLIMÁTICA BRASILEIRA

O estudo de caso da ação climática IEA versus Brasil

Authors

  • Luisa Lauermann Lazzaretti UNISINOS
  • Délton Winter de Carvalho UNISINOS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/conflu.v25i1.55065

Abstract

The IPCC reports are unanimous in predicting that there will be an increase in the impacts of climate change, corroborating that human activity, through the burning of fossil fuels, has warmed the earth since 1850. With this Scenario several aspects of human life and the environment have changed: acidification and rising ocean levels, extinction of several species, melting glaciers. Likewise, these changes have negative impacts on human rights such as food supply, drinking water, health and house. In Brazil, this scenario is reiterated by the disregard for environmental and climate policies that has further fueled this cycle of destruction into a true climate emergency. In this context, Brazilian climate litigation has stood out, since it is a fundamental way to focus the discussion of the various interest groups on a policy focused on a balance environment for present and future generations. This article carried out a study of the Public Climatic Civil Action brought by the Institute of Amazonian Studies (IEA) versus Brazil. The method chosen was the deductive and developed descriptive bibliographic research through publications of change and litigation climate in scientific articles published in the mains databases and relevant doctrine books. It is expected that in Brazil this Climate Civil Action will encourage discussion between civil society and interest groups on this urgent topic as well as the proposal of new climate actions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Luisa Lauermann Lazzaretti, UNISINOS

Funcionária Pública do Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social (INSS) desde 06/05/2013, lotada na Agência de Novo Hamburgo da Gerência Executiva de Novo Hamburgo-RS. Mestrando em Direito Público da UNISINOS com Bolsa CAPES PROEX. Formada em Direito pela Universidade FEEVALE em 2018.

Délton Winter de Carvalho, UNISINOS

Direito pela Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Pós-Doutor em Direito Ambiental e Direito dos Desastres pela University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA (2013), sob a orientação de Daniel A. Farber. Atualmente é Professor Adjunto I no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito – PPGD da Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Membro da Associação Brasileira dos Professores de Direito Ambiental - APRODAB e do Instituto o Direito por um Planeta Verde. Membro do Conselho Editorial da Revista Brasileira de Direito Ambiental e da Revista Direito Ambiental e Sociedade. Líder do Grupo de Pesquisa Direito, Risco e Ecocomplexidade. E-mail: delton@deltoncarvalho.com.br.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Lauermann Lazzaretti, L., & Winter de Carvalho, D. (2023). LITIGÂNCIA CLIMÁTICA BRASILEIRA: O estudo de caso da ação climática IEA versus Brasil. Confluências | Interdisciplinary Review of Sociology and Law, 25(1), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.22409/conflu.v25i1.55065

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023): Confluências, vol. 25, n º1

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Luisa Lauermann Lazzaretti, Délton Winter de Carvalho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors hold the copyright, with first publication rights granted to the journal, being the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which allows the work to be shared with acknowledgement of authorship and first publication in this journal. 
The authors have authorization to separately purchase additional contracts of non-exclusive distribution of the work's version published in this journal (e.g.:publication in institutional repositories or as a book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and first publication in this journal. 
The authors have permission and are encouraged to publish and disseminate their work online (e.g.:in institutional repositories or on their personal page), at any point - either before or during the editorial process, since it may generate productive changes, as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work.