LE BRAZIL AND THE ONEWAY OF AGENDA 2030 COMPLIANCE
COMPANIES, INSTITUTIONS AND NANOTECNOLOGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22409/rcj.v6i13.598Keywords:
Direito Constitucional, Economia Política, Tecnologias EmergentesAbstract
In this global hipecomplexity scenario, developing countries are called upon to contribute a portion of the reduction of these complexities in order to the sustainable development described in Agenda 2030 to be fulfilled. Around Brazil, there is the expectation that this contribution will be significant in view of the fortunate territory it occupies. However, such targets are far from being achieved by the country in face of its poorly developed system and this is a problem for the research. The general objective is to demonstrate that these are two flawed sides of the same coin: the internal, because of little systemic understanding of global communication that includes the role of institutions and new technologies; owing to the low contribution and lack of management of this global systemic communication that goes beyond resources provided in developing countries. As specific objectives, the research intends to demonstrate that this scenario is due to the low national production complexity characterized by trade in goods and services by 80% of the brazilian companies, distributed among small and medium enterprises, which, in turn, are not involved in planning and technological development, with special attention to disruptive nanotechnologies; as a consequence do not contribute to the sustainable development set out in agenda 2030. The initial hypothesis assumes two aspects: for the internal system, the contribution of sectoral institutions in the diffusion of communication involving technological innovation and sustainable development; and, for the global system: direct engagement in the management of resources and in the construction of this systemic communication. The metodology of the research is deductive and adopts the systemic-constructivist perspective as a procedure to arrive at the solution. The research techniques go through the collection of data and documents submitted to the analysis through the bibliographic review.
Downloads
References
BARBIERI, J. C. (2007). Organizações Inovadoras Sustentáveis. In: J. C. BARBIERI, & M. A. SIMANTOB, Organizaões Inovadoras Sustentáveis: uma reflexão sobre o futuro das Organizações (pp. 85-106). São Paulo: Atlas.
BARBIERI, J. C., & SIMANTOB, M. A. (2007). Organizações Inovadoras Sustentáveis: uma reflexão sobre o futuro das Organizações. São Paulo: Atlas.
BAUMANN, Z. (1999). Globalização: as consequências humanas. (M. Penchel, Trad.) Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.
BECK, U. (2011). Sociedade de risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade. (S. Nascimento, Trad.) São Paulo: Editora 34.
BMF&BOVESPA. (2017). Acesso em 15 de Dez de 2017, disponível em BM&FBOVESPA divulga a 12ª Carteira do ISE: http://www.bmfbovespa.com.br/pt_br/noticias/bm-fbovespa-divulga-a-12-carteira-do-ise.htm
BRASIL. (12 de Fev de 2018). www.portaldoempreendedor.gov.br. Acesso em 12 de fev de 2018, disponível em Estatísticas: http://www.portaldoempreendedor.gov.br/estatisticas
CNI. (2013). CNI. Acesso em 10 de Nov de 2017, disponível em Mapa Estratégico da Indústria 2013-2022: http://www.portaldaindustria.com.br/cni/institucional/mapa-estrategico-da-industria-2013-2022/
DRZENIEK-HANOUZ, M. (02 de Jan de 2015). Why Institutions matter for Economic Growth. Acesso em 08 de Apr de 2018, disponível em World Economic Forum: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/01/why-institutions-matter-for-economic-growth/
FOLHA DE SAO PAULO. (May de 2015). Acesso em 15 de Dez de 2017, disponível em Cientistas abrem pequenas Empresas: investindo em Nanotecnologia: Disponível em: http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mercado/2015/05/1632954-cientistas-abrem-pequenas-empresas-investindo-em-nanotecnologia.shtml. Acesso 15 Jan 2017.
GUTERRES, S. S., BECK, R. C., & POHLMANN, A. R. (2012). Nanocosmecêuticos. In: A. COSTA, Tratado Internacional de Cosmecêuticos (p. 428). Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan.
IBGE. (2016). Acesso em 17 de Dez de 2017, disponível em PINTEC 2014: http://www.pintec.ibge.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45&Itemid=12. Acesso 31 Jan 2017.
IBGE. (2017). Acesso em 16 de Nov de 2017, disponível em População: http://www.ibge.gov.br/apps/populacao/projecao/
LUHMANN, N. (1990). (S. L. Petit, & D. Achmitz, Trads.) Barcelona: Paidós Iberica.
LUHMANN, N. (1990b). Essays on Self-Reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
LUHMANN, N. (2005). Organización y Decisión: autopoiesis, acción y entendimiento comunicativo. Santiago de Chile: Instituto de Sociologia. Pontifícia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
LUHMANN, N. (2010). Introdução à Teoria dos Sistemas (2ª ed.). (A. C. Nasser, Trad.) Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
NORDMANN, A. (2014). .Responsible innovation, the art and craft of anticipation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), pp. 87-98.
O´NEILL, O. (2005). Agents of Justice. In: A. Kuper, Global Responsabilities: who must deliver on Human Rights? (pp. 37-52). New York: Routledge.
OECD. (2006). Economic Surveys. Acesso em 10 de Jul de 2017, disponível em Organização Para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico: http://www.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-BR/component/tags/tag/15-ocde-organizacao-para-a-cooperacao-e-o-desenvolvimento-economico
OECD. (21 de Jan de 2018). Making Blended Finance Work for Sustainable Development Goals. (OECD, Ed.) Acesso em 09 de Fev de 2018, disponível em OECD iLibrary: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264288768-en
PEDRESCHI, L. (1 de Sep de 2017). Balancing Efficacy with Policy Space: the Treatment of Public Services in EU Trade Agreements, Journal of International Economic Law. 20(3), pp. 627-647. Acesso em 08 de Fev de 2018, disponível em Oxford Academic: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgx031
SCHOMBERG, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation. In: R. H. OWEN, Responsible Innovation (p. 51). London: John Wiley.
VISEU, A. (17 de Sep de 2015). Interdisciplinarity. Nature, p. 291.
Published
Versions
- 2021-04-01 (2)
- 2019-08-06 (1)
