Uma explicação para o licenciamento de alguns adjetivos em duas posições atributivas em italiano

Ana Paula Quadros Gomes; Nicolly Dutra de Carvalho Cabral

doi:10.22409/gragoata.v29i64.60678.pt

Authors

Ana Paula Quadros Gomes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Nicolly Dutra de Carvalho Cabral Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v29i64.60678.pt

Keywords:

the position of attributive adjectives in Italian, Syntax-semantics interface, The grammar of gradable adjectives in Romance languages

Abstract

The canonical position of the adjectives in Romance languages is post-nominal (Cinque, 1994). However, it is observed a triparted distribution: although the majority of the romance adjectives is exclusively post-nominal, a very few adjectives can be only pre-nominal, and a relatively numerous group of adjectives can come after and also before or the nucleus, with a change in meaning (Gomes; Sudré, 2021). Despite those distributional patterns, cartography (Cinque, 2010, 2014) proposes only two syntactic sources for adjectives: a reduced relative (always post-nominal, leading to extensional interpretation) and functional projections, which include all pre-nominal adjectives and some post-nominal adjectives, responsible for the intensional interpretation. We propose that those adjectives that are licensed in Italian both before and after the nominal head are in a functional projection, DegP (Corver 1991), and are implicit comparatives. The difference in interpretation (intensional and extensional) is a byproduct of the distinct domains from which the comparison parameter comes from, and not determined by the syntax. Neither the distribution nor the interpretation of adjectives in Romance languages can be explained solely based on the syntactic source. We defend the need to resort to semantics, adopting a degree semantics (Kennedy; McNally, 2005). All flexible adjectives (licensed in both the canonical and non-canonical positions) in a corpus of Italian were identified as gradable adjectives by independent tests.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nicolly Dutra de Carvalho Cabral, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Graduanda em Italiano da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade Federal dpo Rio de Janeiro e pesqusiadora em semântica formal com bolsa CNPq (Iniciação Científica).

References

ASNAGHI, E.; MANZO, C.; NICOLACI, P.; ROCCO, R. Italiano facile: percorso semplificato di grammatica. Padova: CEDAM Scuola, 2013.

BOLINGER, D. L. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.

CINQUE, G. et al. The semantic classification of adjectives. A view from syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, v. 35, n. 1, p. 3-32, 2014.

CINQUE, G. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 2010.

CINQUE, G. Adverbs and Functi.onal Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

CINQUE, G. On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In: CINQUE, G. et al. (ed.). Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1994. p. 85-110.

CINQUE, G. Two classes of intransitive adjectives in Italian. Scrambling and Barriers. Linguistik Aktuell, v. 5, p. 261-294, 1990.

CORVER, N. Evidence for DegP. In: SHERER, Tim (ed.). Proceedings of the 21st Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst, MA: GLSA University of Massachusetts, 1991. p. 33-47.

GOMES, A. P. Q.; SUDRÉ, T. G. Entre a modificação e a quantificação: adjetivos como determinantes plurais em português brasileiro (PB). Domínios de Linguagem, Uberlândia, v. 15, n. 1, p. 7-40, jan./mar. 2021.

HEIM, I.; KRATZER, A. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1998.

KENNEDY, C. Adjectives. In: RUSSELL, G.; GRAFF FARA, D. (ed.). Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Language. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2012. p. 328-341.

KENNEDY, C. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. 1997. PhD thesis – University of California, Los Angeles, 1997.

KENNEDY, C.; McNALLY, L. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, v. 81, n. 2, p. 345-381, 2005.

KLEIN, E. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, v. 4, p. 1-45, 1980.

MÜLLER, A. L.; NEGRÃO, E. V.; NUNES-PEMBERTON, G. Adjetivos no português do Brasil: predicados, argumentos ou quantificadores? In: ABAURRE, M. B. M.; RODRIGUES, A. C. S. (org.). Gramática do Português Falado: novos estudos descritivos. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP, 2002. v. VIII, p. 317-344.

PARTEE, B. H. Lexical semantics and compositionality. In: GLEITMAN, L.; LIBERMAN, M. (ed.). Language. An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995. p. 311-360.

ZAMPARELLI, R. Pre-nominal modifiers, degree phrases and the structure of AP. Working Papers in Linguistics, v. 3, n. 1, p. 138-161, 1993.