Marriage and prophylaxis: the family under the gaze of evolutionism in the First Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-202517203Keywords:
civil code, marriage, social medicine, legal ideas in Brazil, evolutionismAbstract
This article analyses the intersection between medical-legal knowledge and civil law in Brazil during the First Republic (1889–1930), focusing on the appropriation of the former by the latter, based on discussions about the regulation of marriage and the family. The text explores how medical knowledge was mobilised in the transition to modernity to provide scientific support for civil law, reflecting tensions between different projects of modernity. The process of appropriation of these ideas, however, is neither linear nor uniform, so we highlight how it occurred in different ways in different parts of the Brazilian legal field. On the one hand, there was the heterodox appropriation of evolutionary ideas by intellectuals linked to the Recife School; on the other, the defence of the auxiliary use of legal medicine as unquestionable expert knowledge on civil relations. This tension is evident in the debates on divorce, paternity, and the legal status of women and illegitimate children that emerged during the passage of the 1916 Civil Code, revealing the persistence of traces of religious culture within legal culture. Based on sources from law school journals in Recife, São Paulo, and Rio de Janeiro, this article argues that one of the effects of this interaction was the centralisation of marriage in the institutional order of republican Brazil as an instrument for preventing social disorder. This process ultimately reinforced hierarchies of race, class, and gender, leaving an ambiguous legacy that still echoes in contemporary Brazilian society.
Downloads
References
BEVILÁQUA, Clóvis. O problema da codificação do direito civil brasileiro. Revista Acadêmica da Faculdade de Direito do Recife, v. 6, n. 1, p. 3-18, 1896. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/ACADEMICA/article/view/238267. Acesso em: 21 jun. 2024.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Esboço de uma teoria da prática. In: ORTIZ, Renato (org.). Pierre Bourdieu: Sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1983. p. 46-81.
CARVALHO, Antônio Amâncio Pereira de. Negação da paternidade. Revista da Faculdade de Direito de São Paulo, v. 12, p. 63-73, 1904. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8227.v12i0p63-73
CHARTIER, Roger. Textos, impressões, leituras. In: HUNT, L. (org.). A nova história cultural. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006.
COSTA, Jurandir Freire. Ordem médica e norma familiar. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1979.
DANTAS, San Tiago. Figuras do Direito. Rio de Janeiro: José Olympio, 1962.
FOUCAULT, Michel. O nascimento da medicina social. In: MACHADO, Roberto (org.). Microfísica do poder. 13. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, 1998. p. 79–98.
GINZBURG, Carlo. Sinais: raízes de um paradigma indiciário. In: ______. Mitos, emblemas, sinais: morfologia e história. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2003. p. 143-179.
GRINBERG, Keila. Código civil e cidadania. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 2001.
MARRAMAO, Giacomo. Céu e terra: genealogia da secularização. São Paulo: UNESP, 1997.
MARX, Karl. Sobre a questão judaica. São Paulo: Boitempo, 2010.
NEDER, Gizlene; CERQUEIRA FILHO, Gisálio. Ideias jurídicas e autoridade na família. Rio de Janeiro: Revan, 2007.
NEVES, Marcelo. Ideias em outro lugar? Constituição liberal e codificação do direito privado na virada do século XIX para o século XX no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v. 30, n. 88, p. 05-27, 2 jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.17666/308805-27/2015
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Passages: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A compromise transferring the copyright is requested, with the author’s signature, as the example below:
I / Us, ..................... , author(s) of the article/review: ................................, which
I/we have submitted to the appreciation of ‘Passagens: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture”, am/are aware of the publishing rules and
agree that the copyright related to it is transferred to the Publishing. I (we) take full responsibility for the content of this article; and is will contribute to the Editors to undertake the changes suggested by the evaluators and the review of bibliographic quotations.
__________________, ____/_____
Signature: ________________________________