La validité juridique du système de règlement en ligne des litiges (RLL) en Inde et en Indonésie
##plugins.pubIds.doi.readerDisplayName##:
https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-202214308Mots-clés:
règlement des litiges en ligne en Inde, règlement des litiges en ligne en Indonésie, Loi sur les technologies de l’information « IT Act », réponse judiciaire, validité juridiqueRésumé
Les progrès de la technologie ont permis d’effectuer plus efficacement de nombreux changements inévitables, facilitant la vie des êtres humains. Il est nécessaire de profiter des avantages de la technologie dans le mécanisme de règlement des litiges pour assurer une administration efficace et performante de la justice. Le règlement en ligne des litiges (RLL), qui a sans aucun doute été adopté et mis en place par les systèmes d’administration de la justice du monde entier, marque un tournant de l’évolution dans ce domaine. Cependant, la question demeure de savoir si le système d’administration de la justice est prêt à faire face au même rythme aux changements en cours dans la société et la technologie. Les lois existantes sont-elles suffisantes pour gérer le système en ligne en tant que mécanisme efficace de règlement des litiges entre les parties ? Pour répondre à cette question, cette recherche a identifié les lois pertinentes permettant l’utilisation du mécanisme RLL en Inde et en Indonésie, étant donné que leur cadre juridique d’arbitrage actuel, ayant trait au règlement des litiges par le biais du mécanisme RLL, manque de lois spécifiques. La recherche a adopté une approche mixte, utilisant des données primaires et secondaires pour suivre et comparer les systèmes RLL de l’Inde et de l’Indonésie. Nous avons conclu que les solutions RLL sont valides et exécutoires dans le cadre juridique actuel des deux pays. Par conséquent, les personnes ne doivent pas hésiter à faire appel au mécanisme RLL pour résoudre leurs différends. De même, il a été démontré que les lois existantes des deux pays peuvent intégrer, adopter et améliorer le processus global et les solutions du mécanisme RLL par le biais d’amendements et de directives indépendantes.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Références
BADAN ARBITRASE NASIONAL INDONESIA (BANI). Decree Number 20.015/V.SK-BANI/HU, May 28, 2020. Electronic Arbitration Decree. Available at: https://www.franswinarta.com/news/electronic-hearing-in-bani-arbitration-center-bani/. Accessed on: Feb. 8, 2022.
GENEVA CONVENTION 1927 - Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards signed at Geneva on the twenty sixth day of september, nineteen hundred and twenty-seven. Trans-Lex1927. Available at: https://www.trans-lex.org/511400. Accessed on: Jan. 23, 2022.
GERUNGAN, Alexandra. Indonesia - The New Regulation on E-Litigation. Conventus Law, Nov. 14, 2019. Available at: https://www.conventuslaw.com/report/indonesia-the-new-regulation-on-e-litigation/. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872. India Code, Mar. 15, 1872. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2188?sam_handle=123456789/1362. Accessed on: Jan. 12, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Indian Stamp Act, 1899. India Code, Jan. 27, 1899. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/15510?sam_handle=123456789/1362. Accessed on: Jan. 23, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. India Code, Mar. 21, 1908a. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2191?sam_handle=123456789/1362. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Registration Act, 1908. India Code, Dec. 18, 1908b. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2190?view_type=search&sam_handle=123456789/1362. Accessed on: Jan. 24, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Limitation Act, 1963. India Code, Oct. 5, 1963. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1565?view_type=search&sam_handle=123456789/1362. Accessed on: Jan. 24, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. India Code, Aug. 16, 1996 (last update: Mar. 12, 2021). 1996. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1978/1/AAA1996__26.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 12, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. The Information Technology Act, 2000. India Code. June 9, 2000. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1999. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Information Technology Act 2002. 2002. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13116/1/it_act_2000_updated.pdf Accessed on: Oct. 12, 2022.
INDIA. Supreme Court. The State of Maharashtra vs Dr. Praful B. Desai on 1 April, 2003. 2003a. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/560467/. Accessed on: Jan. 23, 2022.
INDIA. Supreme Court. M. Anasuya Devi And Anr vs M. Manik Reddy And Ors on 16 October, 2003. 2003b. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/772616/. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Information Technology (amended) Act, 2008. 2008. Available at: https://cactusblog.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/it_act_2008.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Information Technology (Amended) Act 2016. 2016. Available at: https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/13116/1/it_act_2000_updated.pdf Accessed on: Oct. 12, 2022.
INDIA. Ministry of Law and Justice. Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act 2015. 2015. Available at: https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A2016-4_1.pdf. Accessed on: Feb. 22, 2022.
INDIA. Supreme Court. Press Release 25/11/2019. 2019. Available at: https://main.sci.gov.in/pdf/Press/press%20release%20for%20law%20day%20celebratoin.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 23, 2022.
INDIA. Supreme Court. Supreme Court Letter No.1 of 2020 on Conduct Guidelines during the Period of Preventing the Spread of Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID-19). Leks&Co Lawyers, Mar. 23, 2020. Available at: https://www.lekslawyer.com/supreme-court-letter-no-1-of-2020-on-conduct-guidelines-during-the-period-of-preventing-the-spread-of-corona-virus-disease-19-covid-19/. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDONESIA. Indonesian Law Number 30 of 1999 (Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution). Aug. 12, 1999. Available at: http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/Laws/Law%20No.%2030%20of%201999%20on%20Arbitration%20and%20Alternative%20Dispute%20Resolution%20(no%20elucidation).pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 20, 2022.
INDONESIA. Law of the Republic of Indonesia no. 11 of 2008. Apr. 21, 2008. Available at: http://www.flevin.com/id/lgso/translations/JICA%20Mirror/english/4846_UU_11_2008_e.html#:~:text=(1)%20Unless%20provided%20otherwise%20by,damages%20incurred%20under%20this%20Law. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
INDONESIA. KPPU has issued Regulation on 6th April 2020 Available at: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/176848/keputusan-kppu-no-12kppukep1iv2020-tahun-2020 Accessed on: Oct. 12, 2022.
NARIMAN, Rohinton Fali. Arjun Panditrao Khotkar vs Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal on 14 July, 2020. Supreme Court of India, Civil Appeal No. 20825-20826 of 2017. 2020. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/172105947/. Accessed on: Feb. 8, 2022;
NEW YORK ARBITRATION CONVENTION. United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. New York, Jun. 10, 1958. Available at: https://www.newyorkconvention.org/english. Accessed on: Feb. 20, 2022.
NITI Ayog. The NITI Aayog Expert Committee on ODR. Designing the future of dispute resolution: The ODR Policy Plan for India. Oct. 2021. Available at: https://www.niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2021-11/odr-report-29-11-2021.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE LAW. UNCITRAL: Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution. New York: United Nations, 2017. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/v1700382_english_technical_notes_on_odr.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 22, 2022.
##submission.downloads##
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Copyright (c) 2022 Passages: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
Solicita-se enviar, em anexo, um termo de transferência de direitos autorais, contendo assinatura do(a)s autor(a)s, conforme o modelo abaixo:
Este trabalho está licenciado com uma Licença licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
