Occupational risks: from traditional methodologies to analysis of labor situations

Authors

  • Elvia Lane Araújo Nascimento UEPB (Universidade Estadual da Paraiba)
  • Sarita Brazão Vieira UFPB (Universidade Federal da Paraiba)
  • Tania Batista da Cunha UFPB (Universidade Federal da Paraiba)

Keywords:

occupational risks, labor security, prudence knowledge, labor policies

Abstract

The objective sought after is to discuss the occupational risks according to two aspects: the tributary one to traditional methodologies in labor security whose focus is the one of regulations set by qualified professionals in that field, and another one that suggests the participation of workers. As a participative approach, the reference is the Psychodinamic of Work and the Ergonomics. The revision of the literature points that although there is much effort for implementing management and public policies through a more effective participation of workers, a supremacy of traditional methodology in the occupational risk analysis is observed. Their causes are analyzed reassuring the need of new theoretical and methodological topics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elvia Lane Araújo Nascimento, UEPB (Universidade Estadual da Paraiba)

Psicóloga, Mestre em Engenharia de Produção pela UFPB, professora da UEPB (Universidade Estadual da Paraiba)

Sarita Brazão Vieira, UFPB (Universidade Federal da Paraiba)

Doutora em Ciências da Saúde pela UFRJ, mestre em Psicologia Social pela UFPB, professora e pesquisadora do Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Social e do Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção da UFPB. 

Tania Batista da Cunha, UFPB (Universidade Federal da Paraiba)

Psicóloga, mestre em Psicologia Social pela UFPB, professora do IFPB (Instituto Federal de Educação Tecnológica da Paraiba).

Published

2010-05-01

How to Cite

NASCIMENTO, E. L. A.; VIEIRA, S. B.; CUNHA, T. B. DA. Occupational risks: from traditional methodologies to analysis of labor situations. Fractal: Journal of Psychology, v. 22, n. 1, p. 115-126, 1 May 2010.

Issue

Section

Articles