The crises and criticism facing human rights discourse: suggestions for restoring meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-201810201Keywords:
Human rights, crisis, critical perspective, StateAbstract
A significant discrepancy exists between human rights discourse and its practice, contributing to its ineffectiveness. As such a context is, however, more reflective of an erroneous perspective than a true misrepresentation, the following article aims to readjust such perspectives, contrasting human rights as discourse and human rights as action, suggesting a critical approach and pointing to several possible ways to restore meaning. In terms of methodology, a phenomenological-hermeneutical approach is adopted, allied with the methods of historical and monographic procedure and the research technique of indirect documentation. The results highlight that alternatives for restoring the meaning of human rights depend on the very recognition of state, theoretical and tangible shortcomings, as well as a reinforcement of social movements and bonds in favor of discourse and practice that are truly emancipatory.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
A compromise transferring the copyright is requested, with the author’s signature, as the example below:
I / Us, ..................... , author(s) of the article/review: ................................, which
I/we have submitted to the appreciation of ‘Passagens: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture”, am/are aware of the publishing rules and
agree that the copyright related to it is transferred to the Publishing. I (we) take full responsibility for the content of this article; and is will contribute to the Editors to undertake the changes suggested by the evaluators and the review of bibliographic quotations.
__________________, ____/_____
Signature: ________________________________