Common law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-202315108

Keywords:

community law, common law, legal anthropology, theory of state and law, history of state and of law

Abstract

The following article examines the problem of conceptualizing the socio-normative order, which is not directly related to State activities and in most cases is referred to in legal science by the terms “legal customs” and “common law”. By analyzing the conventional theory of “common” law, the author seeks to contemplate this concept from a new perspective, identifying a series of theoretical and epistemological problems associated with it. This reveals that the most common definition of common law is quite contradictory, with the ambiguity of this concept and its unjustifiably wide application impoverishing the content. At the same time, it would be incorrect to deem that the laws of pre-state societies and state-organized societies that maintained legal institutions independent of the state “consist” mainly of customs, which would, in turn, be the result of “multiple repetitions” of certain (relatively random) actions. Using fundamentally different principles for the classification of law, the author does not base himself on formal classification criteria, but on the nature of those social forces that guarantee the fulfilment of legal norms. From this basis, he introduces and grounds the concept of community law. The article thus demonstrates that this concept is more relevant to a definition of law which is not based on the will of state power. The reach of this concept is entirely compatible with the set of manifestations that it designates, and its use helps to avoid the contradictions and dubious connotations that arise from the use of the term “common law”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pavel Kostogryzov, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doutor em Ciências Históricas (кандидат исторических наук), Senior Researcher no Instituto de Filosofia e Direito da Academia Russa de Ciências - Sucursal dos Urais (УрО РАН).

Olga Pisnitchenko, Universidade Federal de Roraima, Boa Vista, RR

Professora de História Antiga e Medieval na Universidade Federal de Roraima. Coordenadora do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em História Antiga e Medieval da UFRR (GEPHAM - UFRR). Possui graduação em História pela Universidade Federal do Paraná (2000) e mestrado em Teoria e História Literária pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (2004). Doutora em História pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (2016). Membro da SEEM - Sociedad Española de Estudios Medievales desde 2014.

Fernando César Costa Xavier, Universidade Estadual de Roraima, Caracaraí, RR

Professor Associado do Instituto de Ciências Jurídicas da Universidade Federal de Roraima. Professor permanente do Mestrado em Segurança Pública, Cidadania e Direitos Humanos da Universidade Estadual de Roraima. Doutor em Relações Internacionais pela Universidade de Brasília, e Doutorando em Sociologia e Direito pela Universidade Federal Fluminense.

References

ALIMZHAN, Kairat. Вопросы теории обычного права [port.: Questões de teoria de direito consuetudiário]. Almaty: Izd. centr Obshchestv. fonda “Interlegal”, 2003.

BARIÉ, Cletus Gregor. Derecho Indígena y Medios Alternativos de Resolución de Conflictos. Urvio, Revista Latinoamericana de Seguridad Ciudadana, Quito, n. 3, p. 110-118, 2008. https://doi.org/10.17141/urvio.3.2008.1077

BEZGIN, Vladimir Borisovich. Мужицкая правда. Обычное право и суд русских крестьян. [port.: Direito consuetudinário e o tribunal dos camponeses russos]. Moscow: Common place, 2017.

BOCHAROV, Vladimir Vladimirovich. Неписаный закон: Антропология права [port.: Lei não-escrita. Antropologia do direito]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo AIK., 2013.

BRANDT, Hans-Jürgen.; FRANCO, Rocío (Ed.). Justicia comunitaria en los Andes: Perú y Ecuador. El tratamiento de conflictos: un estudio de actas en 133 comunidades indígenas y campesinas en Ecuador y Perú. Lima: IDL, 2006. v. 1.

DUMANOV, Hassan Mukhtarovich; PERSHITS, Abram Isaakovich. К уточнению понятия «обычное право» [port.: Definição do conceito “Direito consuetudiário”]. Государство и право, n. 3, p. 77-82, 2005.

KOVLER, Anatoly Ivanovich. Антропология права и правовой плюрализм [port.: Antropologia do direito e pluralismo jurídico] Олень всегда прав: исследования по юридической антропологии. Moscow: «Strategiya», 2003. p. 24-50.

KOSTOGRYZOV, Pavel Igorevich. Юридическая антропология в поисках парадигмы [port.: Antropologia jurídica em busca de paradigma] Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, v. 17, n. 4, p. 81-99, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17506/ryipl.2016.17.4.8199

KOSTOGRYZOV, Pavel Igorevich. Общинное правосудие в странах Латинской Америки [port.: Justiça comunitária nos países de América Latina] Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2018.

LOMAKINA, Irina Borisovna. Этническое обычное право: теоретико-правовой аспект [port.: Direito consuetudinário étnico: Aspectos teóricos e jurídicos]. Abstract thesis (Doctor of jurisprudence)_St. Petersburg, 2005.

МАЛЫЙ ЭНЦИКЛОПЕДИЧЕСКИЙ СЛОВАРЬ. T. II. Выпуск IV-ый [port.: Pequeno Dicionário Enciclopédico de Brokgauz & Efron, Tomo II, IV, 2a ed., rev., St. Petersburg: Brokgauz & Efron, 1909.

NEBRATENKO, Gennady Gennadievich. Институционализация обычно-правовой системы в общей теории права [port.: Institucionalização do direito consuetudinário em teoria geral do direito]. Moscow: Vuzovskaya kniga, 2010.

NEBRATENKO, Gennady Gennadievich. Обычно-правовая система: структура и элементы [port.: Sistema de Direito consuetudinário: estrutura e elementos]. Rostov-on-Don: YURIF RANHiGS. 2013.

PUCHTA, Georg Friedrich. Курс римского гражданского права [port.: Curso de direito civil romano]. T. 1. Moscow: Izd. F. N. Plevako, 1874.

ROULAND, Norbert Юридическая антропология [port.: Antropologia jurídica]. Moscow: NORMA, 1999.

SAVIGNY, Friedrich Kral. von. Система современного римского права [port.: Sistema de direito romano contemporâneo]. Moscow: Statut., 2011. t. 1.

SINITSYNA, Irina Evgenievna. В мире обычая [port.: O mundo dos costumes]. Moscow: Vostochnaya literatura RAN, 1997.

SKVORTSOVA, Yulia Vyacheslavovna. Обычное право как структурно-функциональный элемент правовой системы России [port.: Direito consuetudinário como elemento do sistema jurídico da Rússia]. Scientific works of the Russian Academy of Lawyers and Notaries, v. 1, n. 24, p. 45-53, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17895247. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.

SUPATAEV, Murat Abdykasimovich. Обычное право в странах Восточной Африки [port.: Direito consuetudinário nos países da África oriental] Moscow: Nauka, 1984.

SUKHAREV Alexandr Yakovlevich; KRUTSKIKH Vladimir Emelyanovich. (Ed.). Большой юридический словарь [port.: Grande dicionário jurídico]. 2nd ed., rev. and augm., Moscow: Infra-M, 2001.

SIEDER, Rachel. Derecho consuetudinario y Transición Democrática en Guatemala. Cuaderno de Debate, FLACSO-Guatemala, dic. 1996. Disponível em: https://www.rachelsieder.com/es/derecho-consuetudinario-y-transicion-democratica-en-guatemala-2/. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.

UNDERSTANDING access to justice and conflict resolution at the local level in the Сentral African Republic. The World Bank Group, 24 fev. 2012. Disponível em: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/970091468192841525/understanding-access-to-justice-and-conflict-resolution-at-the-local-level-in-the-central-african-republic-car. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.

YRIGOYEN FAJARDO, Raquel. Legal Pluralism, Indigenous Law and the Special Jurisdiction in the Andean Countries. Beyond Law, n. 27, р. 32-49, 2004.

Published

2023-02-10

How to Cite

Kostogryzov, P., Pisnitchenko, O., & Xavier, F. C. C. (2023). Common law. Passages: International Review of Political History and Legal Culture, 15(1), 151-174. https://doi.org/10.15175/1984-2503-202315108